incubator-cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Kishan Kavala <Kishan.Kav...@citrix.com>
Subject RE: [ASFCS41] nTier Apps 2.0
Date Tue, 08 Jan 2013 11:39:38 GMT
I've added the spec for nTier Apps 2.0 here.

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/nTier+Apps+2.0+Functional+Spec

Please let me know your thoughts and suggestions.


-----Original Message-----
From: Jessica Tomechak [mailto:Jessica.Tomechak@citrix.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, 8 January 2013 11:26 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [ASFCS41] nTier Apps 2.0

Doc subtasks for corresponding eng subtasks seems fine to me...


Jessica T.
CloudStack Tech Pubs


-----Original Message-----
From: Radhika Puthiyetath [mailto:radhika.puthiyetath@citrix.com]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2013 4:40 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [ASFCS41] nTier Apps 2.0

Should we be creating Doc sub-task for each sub-tasks, or just a single sub-task under the
main feature defect ?

Because nTier Apps 2.0 comparatively covers vast areas, I created multiple sub tasks for documentation
under each feature sub-tasks.
Please correct me.
-Radhika

-----Original Message-----
From: Kishan Kavala [mailto:Kishan.Kavala@citrix.com]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2013 5:55 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [ASFCS41] nTier Apps 2.0

 751, 752, 754 and 756 have corresponding doc bugs as sub-tasks. Probably Jira doesn't allow
multi-level subtasks.

-----Original Message-----
From: Manan Shah [mailto:manan.shah@citrix.com]
Sent: Saturday, 5 January 2013 1:06 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [ASFCS41] nTier Apps 2.0

Kishan, it appears that these JIRA tickets are not created as sub-tickets.
It would have been good if you would have created them as sub-tasks. I tried to convert these
tickets to sub-tasks and was able to convert most of them except 751, 752, 754 and 756. I
suspect these didn't give me a option because they have further sub-tasks.

Chip, Alex, Chiradeep, is there anyway to convert 751, 752, 754 and 756 as sub-tasks of 621?

Regards,
Manan Shah




On 1/4/13 5:13 AM, "Kishan Kavala" <Kishan.Kavala@citrix.com> wrote:

>nTier Apps 2.0 requirement has 20 sub-items which are not 
>inter-dependant. I created individual bugs for each of the sub-items 
>and assigned to myself the items which I plan to work on.
>
>Bug numbers: 746 to 768 (except 756)
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Manan Shah [mailto:manan.shah@citrix.com]
>Sent: Friday, 14 December 2012 10:19 PM
>To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
>Subject: Re: [ASFCS41] nTier Apps 2.0
>
>Sure, Hugo. I can add that. As you said, longer term, we should make 
>this work with an SDN based solution as well.
>
>Regards,
>Manan Shah
>
>
>
>
>On 12/14/12 5:32 AM, "Hugo Trippaers" <HTrippaers@schubergphilis.com>
>wrote:
>
>>Hey Manah,
>>
>>Can you put in a requirements that this feature is only available if 
>>Vlans are actually in use? It might be interesting to make sure that 
>>this "nTier apps" is also available for sites with an SDN based 
>>installation like Nicira NVP.
>>
>>Cheers,
>>
>>Hugo
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Manan Shah [mailto:manan.shah@citrix.com]
>>> Sent: Friday, December 14, 2012 12:30 AM
>>> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>> Subject: Re: [ASFCS41] nTier Apps 2.0
>>> 
>>> Thanks David for brining a good point regarding 2.18. You are 
>>>correct that a  VLAN should not be exposed to an end user. I will 
>>>re-word the requirement  to make it more specific for an admin to assign a VLAN.
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> Manan Shah
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 12/13/12 1:24 PM, "David Nalley" <david@gnsa.us> wrote:
>>> 
>>> >It's very hard to have a discussion here when all of the 
>>> >information to be discussed is elsewhere. Please consider posting 
>>> >it here for the discussion.
>>> >
>>> >WRT 2.18 - Allowing an end user to assign a  VLAN ID strikes me as 
>>> >very undesirable. First, it allows users to have insight into the 
>>> >underlying infrastructure when lots of work has been exerted to 
>>> >abstract all of that away from end users. Secondly, it is 
>>> >information leakage, because you can't allow collisions, so there 
>>> >will be a failure to provision the VLAN which will tell folks that 
>>> >the VLAN is in use, which could provide information as to the size 
>>> >of the underlying network infrastructure or other information.
>>> >
>>> >--David
>>> >
>>> >On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Manan Shah <manan.shah@citrix.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> >> Hi,
>>> >>
>>> >> I would like to propose a new feature for extending the nTier 
>>> >>Apps feature introduced in CS 4.0. I have created a JIRA ticket 
>>> >>and provided the requirements at the following location.  Please 
>>> >>provide feedback on the requirements.
>>> >>
>>> >> JIRA Ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-621
>>> >> Requirements:
>>> >>https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/nTier+Apps+
>>> >>2
>>> .0+
>>> >>Req
>>> >>uirements
>>> >>
>>> >> Regards,
>>> >> Manan Shah
>>
>


Mime
View raw message