Mailing-List: contact cloudstack-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of donal.lafferty@citrix.com
 designates 46.33.159.39 as permitted sender)
From: Donal Lafferty <donal.lafferty@citrix.com>
To: "cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org"
	<cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 11:09:07 +0000
Subject: Under ASF2.0 can I copyright refactored code without adding the
 original author's copyright notice?
Thread-Topic: Under ASF2.0 can I copyright refactored code without adding
 the original author's copyright notice?
Thread-Index: Ac3WxpJb0IaGU0B6RbGXWZkqP3OeUw==
Message-ID: 
 <81A73678E76EA642801C8F2E4823AD21012F0D628F05@LONPMAILBOX01.citrite.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="_000_81A73678E76EA642801C8F2E4823AD21012F0D628F05LONPMAILBOX_"
MIME-Version: 1.0

--_000_81A73678E76EA642801C8F2E4823AD21012F0D628F05LONPMAILBOX_
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Does anyone have a link describing the attribution requirements for code li=
censed under ASF v2.0?

I noticed some driver code on another CloudOS project that appears to be a =
derivative of a previous version of the same driver in that code base.  The=
 comments are unchanged and the structure very similar.  Both versions of t=
he driver are ASF v2.0, but the derivative work lacks the original author's=
 copyright notice.

Is this legit under ASF 2.0?

I'd have thought at the very least you had to carry forward notice from the=
 original work.

--_000_81A73678E76EA642801C8F2E4823AD21012F0D628F05LONPMAILBOX_--