incubator-cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Edison Su <Edison...@citrix.com>
Subject RE: Request for cloudstack-qa mailing list and QA Scrum call
Date Wed, 19 Dec 2012 00:23:07 GMT
No problem, as long as I can set a filter rule on the incoming emails easily:)
Will the email subject all starting with [QA]?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sudha Ponnaganti [mailto:sudha.ponnaganti@citrix.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2012 4:10 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Request for cloudstack-qa mailing list and QA Scrum call
> 
> Sorry Edison, Mailing list request is to put spam in there:-) Hope it is clear by
> now from all other threads.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Edison Su [mailto:Edison.su@citrix.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2012 3:18 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Request for cloudstack-qa mailing list and QA Scrum call
> 
> +1, the email coming from JIRA MUST be put into another separate mailing
> +list, otherwise, I either mark them as spam, or add a filter rule in my
> +outlook...:)
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Sudha Ponnaganti [mailto:sudha.ponnaganti@citrix.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2012 3:02 PM
> > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: Request for cloudstack-qa mailing list and QA Scrum call
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Reaching out to community to see if we can have a dedicated QA mailing
> > list mainly to have a focused attention around QA Activities.
> >
> >
> > -          To discuss automation acceleration. We already have sizable scripts
> and
> > need to get those running  in to apache env
> >
> > -          Discuss QA strategy and have community participate little bit more -
> > Dev community is very active but QA is not at the same level.  There
> > are too many discussions in dev mailing list already. Afraid that QA
> > may not get enough attention
> >
> > -          Discuss project QA activities and track progress and present relevant
> > info to community. Intention is not to take away visibility but to
> > have a focused vision on QA.
> >
> > -          Discuss other QA initiatives and have owners drive these initiatives
-
> > mainly around automation frameworks, tools implementation for QA
> >
> >
> > Please do express your opinion on this.
> >
> > Also I am going to setup a call to discuss ASF CS 4.1 release QA
> > activities starting next week as we are getting close to the release.
> >
> > Thanks
> > /Sudha

Mime
View raw message