Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9C2E4D383 for ; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 14:58:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 846 invoked by uid 500); 26 Oct 2012 14:58:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 753 invoked by uid 500); 26 Oct 2012 14:58:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cloudstack-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 179 invoked by uid 99); 26 Oct 2012 14:58:48 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 14:58:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.149.211] (HELO na3sys009aog114.obsmtp.com) (74.125.149.211) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 14:58:41 +0000 Received: from mail-vb0-f69.google.com ([209.85.212.69]) (using TLSv1) by na3sys009aob114.postini.com ([74.125.148.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUIqlC8HByea8p53KvwThjXJWX/qV2+v+@postini.com; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 07:58:21 PDT Received: by mail-vb0-f69.google.com with SMTP id fq11so4550159vbb.0 for ; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 07:58:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=Ad+N+TyvA3EOq3guy8NuLfoezbQYCYeumtMbw/l0qWg=; b=aICda7gw8zal02wFs99Vc11GCTXnpJrXS5XqLqifHH9Ipllh/Aa2I8t6RikaHdVWG+ G2Rn2WE3GNZcoq2FTohV2iG4Jmu/0W4c49DzG3X4v8p4n9LfApm2e/+IQ51Nn8aiJl0b co1MqcznZGOPUG+mrYh2qR+XmhcH3oLTJQou9jE4vksil5L9sgKliGFJr1AlcUk72jkh dSO9+nky+tQVzRRPiqO5sKlIK1jfxIAqgXIjBvyz2rR682CCsdH2RROhxO3cB4CrugpR eBV6yWLks6KgFDteZOMY+rWV2KEa0VY7GQk6LURdd3VKgFDwQ8JFcD3Us0TXjAlN8Du5 +X0A== Received: by 10.52.98.66 with SMTP id eg2mr30119610vdb.60.1351263498698; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 07:58:18 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.98.66 with SMTP id eg2mr30119603vdb.60.1351263498582; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 07:58:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.58.239.135 with HTTP; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 07:58:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1351263335.31684.140661145789161.19CACA28@webmail.messagingengine.com> References: <1351263335.31684.140661145789161.19CACA28@webmail.messagingengine.com> Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 10:58:18 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Adopt the Monkey? From: Chip Childers To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQm0LbGWgBlWfSw5SJmzH39ICeITP+Leyl/dMyuNmsSSF1wqJ0CJSpsH2OzsDBWE7qG4vMzSF5jCFURy+eHR6wjE/7lHFT1/NCn8DyOA7djS13UWzvi69yUi9GrymxlTfs4LPr7ngCR1TGJ3LEqUqIUFndXQl0fP8ZQNIuSt4BwEJ+1ADqFLZ8rvwk2DLh7Xs/HloNKc X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 10:55 AM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > Howdy all, > > So - this is a discussion that we need to have, but I've been holding > off on starting because it seemed fairly trivial in the face of all the > work going on towards 4.0.0-incubating. > > We seem to be at a good place with regards to 4.0.0-incubating, so while > we're waiting for a few more votes - let's discuss. > > Earlier this year, Citrix held a mascot contest: > http://www.cloudstackmascot.org/ > > The winner is the "Monkey King" inspired by the Chinese novel/story > "Journey to the West". You can see it at the mascot site. > > The question is, do we actually want to adopt this for the Apache > project? +1 - Monkeys are always the right way to go. For the record, this is the specific image in question: http://www.cloudstackmascot.org/images4/cloud_monkey_winner.png > If the answer is "yes," the next step is to actually do the > legwork/legal work to make sure that it'd be suitable for us to use. If > anyone knows of any conflicting trademarks or whatnot, that could make > the decision for us - but otherwise, I'd suggest we discuss the first > question and then take on the legal question. > > Thoughts, comments, flames? > > (The kitten riding the unicorn over a rainbow will, of course, remain an > unofficial mascot. http://dissociatedpress.net/uploads/) > -- > Joe Brockmeier > jzb@zonker.net > Twitter: @jzb > http://www.dissociatedpress.net/ >