incubator-cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alena Prokharchyk <Alena.Prokharc...@citrix.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.0.0-incubating Release, first round
Date Thu, 11 Oct 2012 04:37:47 GMT
+1

Thanks everyone for great work!

-Alena.

On 10/10/12 9:34 PM, "Sheng Yang" <sheng@yasker.org> wrote:

>+1
>
>--Sheng
>
>On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:29 PM, Mice Xia <mice_xia@tcloudcomputing.com>
>wrote:
>> +1
>>
>> -Mice
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.yadav@citrix.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2012 12:24 PM
>> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.0.0-incubating Release, first
>>round
>>
>> +1
>> Cheers!
>> ________________________________________
>> From: Radhika Puthiyetath [radhika.puthiyetath@citrix.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2012 9:46 AM
>> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.0.0-incubating Release, first
>>round
>>
>> +1
>> Great work !
>>
>> -Radhika
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Kelven Yang [mailto:kelven.yang@citrix.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2012 9:43 AM
>> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.0.0-incubating Release, first
>>round
>>
>> +1
>>
>> Kelven
>>
>> On 10/10/12 9:05 PM, "Prachi Damle" <Prachi.Damle@citrix.com> wrote:
>>
>>>+1 !
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Sateesh Chodapuneedi [mailto:sateesh.chodapuneedi@citrix.com]
>>>Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2012 9:04 PM
>>>To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>Cc: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.0.0-incubating Release, first
>>>round
>>>
>>>+1, great start!
>>>
>>>Regards,
>>>Sateesh
>>>
>>>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>---
>>>--------------------------------------------------
>>>"This e-mail message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s)
>>>and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. Any
>>>unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If
>>>you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply
>>>e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message."
>>>
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Edison Su [mailto:Edison.su@citrix.com]
>>>> Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2012 9:26 AM
>>>> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>> Cc: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.0.0-incubating Release, first
>>>> round
>>>>
>>>> +1, we are finally there!
>>>>
>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>
>>>> On Oct 10, 2012, at 6:21 PM, "Chip Childers (ASF)"
>>>><chipchilders@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > Hi All,
>>>> >
>>>> > I would like to call a vote for Apache CloudStack (Incubating)
>>>> > Release 4.0.0-incubating.
>>>> >
>>>> > Instructions for Validating and Testing the artifacts can be found
>>>>here:
>>>> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CloudStack+4.
>>>> > 0+test+procedure
>>>> >
>>>> > We encourage the whole community to download and test these release
>>>> > artifacts so that any critical issues can be resolved before the
>>>> > release is made. Everyone is free to vote on this release, so
>>>> > please give it a shot!
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > The following artifacts are up for the vote:
>>>> > http://people.apache.org/~chipchilders/dist/cloudstack/releases/4.0.
>>>> > 0-incubating/
>>>> >
>>>> > PGP release keys (signed using A99A5D58):
>>>> > http://people.apache.org/~chipchilders/dist/cloudstack/KEYS
>>>> >
>>>> > Git Branch and Commit SH:
>>>> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-cloudstack.git;
>>>> > a
>>>> > =shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.0
>>>> > Commit: 5ee613fbf2da5f6212f2f166c980506e0c6cb5cb
>>>> >
>>>> > List of changes:
>>>> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-cloudstack.git;
>>>> > a
>>>> > =blob_plain;f=CHANGES;hb=refs/heads/4.0
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PPMC and IPMC members please
>>>> > be sure to indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
>>>> > [ ] +1  approve
>>>> > [ ] +0  no opinion
>>>> > [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>>>> >
>>>> > Thanks!
>>>> >
>>>> > -chip
>>
>



Mime
View raw message