incubator-cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Chip Childers <chip.child...@sungard.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Should we simplify our release source archive format from 2 to 1?
Date Fri, 12 Oct 2012 17:00:29 GMT
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 12:58 PM, John Kinsella <jlk@stratosec.co> wrote:
> bz2 seems pretty standard to me by now…
>
> For the 10/10 RC, the tar.gz was 10895157B, when I re-compressed as .tar.bz2 it's 8536610
- 22% smaller. For a few hundred downloads, the ASF servers (and various ISPs) will thank
you...

Fair enough!  I'll make the change.

> John
>
> On Oct 12, 2012, at 8:03 AM, Chip Childers <chip.childers@sungard.com> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 10:49 AM, David Nalley <david@gnsa.us> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 10:41 AM, Chip Childers
>>> <chip.childers@sungard.com> wrote:
>>>> Since I unilaterally setup the release do to both .zip and .tar.gz,
>>>> I'd like to convert to ONLY releasing .tar.gz.
>>>>
>>>> Without disagreement, I'll assume consensus.
>>>>
>>>> I'm going to move forward with that change, for the purpose of getting
>>>> done...  but I can always revert if there is a disagreement.
>>>>
>>>> -chip
>>>
>>>
>>> Yes please.
>>>
>>> And to be contrarian - lets do it as bz2 :)
>>>
>>> --David
>>>
>>
>> Are you being serious about bz2?  I'd disagree about doing that, since
>> gz is more well known and understood (IMO, or perhaps just by me).
>>
>
> Stratosec - Secure Infrastructure as a Service
> o: 415.315.9385
> @johnlkinsella
>

Mime
View raw message