incubator-cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sudha Ponnaganti <sudha.ponnaga...@citrix.com>
Subject RE: [ASF40] AWS API Ubuntu packaging
Date Wed, 10 Oct 2012 17:19:41 GMT
We are checking non-OSS Ubuntu right now.  ( RHEL is done last night)
Let us know if you have touched oss packaging as well. If that is the case we need to repeat
testing for OSS as well

-----Original Message-----
From: Will Chan [mailto:will.chan@citrix.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2012 9:41 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [ASF40] AWS API Ubuntu packaging

Is this for OSS or non-OSS build?  The reason I ask is because Citrix QA verified that the
OSS build was working last night.

Will

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.childers@sungard.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2012 9:17 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [ASF40] AWS API Ubuntu packaging
> 
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 12:15 PM, Wido den Hollander <wido@widodh.nl> 
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The last couple of hours I've worked on the last blocker, the AWS
> packaging
> > for Ubuntu.
> >
> > I made the package depend on a couple of JAR files from the Ubuntu 
> > repository since:
> > A. We don't have to package them, they are already available in the 
> > repo B. They conflict with other packages (See commit messages).
> >
> > I just build the packages from the 4.0 branch and tested them (build 
> > &
> > deploy) on a fresh 12.04 system and the AWS API seems to deploy, I
> haven't
> > fired any commands at it however.
> >
> > I also removed the postinst stuff and moved it to the debian/rules 
> > file so that it gets packaged (commit:
> 3854de46ce6e2eaf81de695c31e37f0f77228938)
> >
> > I'd like to have this verified by another pair of eyes, but I think 
> > it's working.
> >
> > Wido
> >
> 
> Can one of the test engineers please do a sanity test now?

Mime
View raw message