Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 32AC9DEDD for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 20:17:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 41961 invoked by uid 500); 12 Sep 2012 20:17:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 41912 invoked by uid 500); 12 Sep 2012 20:17:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cloudstack-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 41904 invoked by uid 99); 12 Sep 2012 20:17:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 20:17:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.216.175] (HELO mail-qc0-f175.google.com) (209.85.216.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 20:17:36 +0000 Received: by qcad10 with SMTP id d10so1501503qca.6 for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 13:17:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type :x-gm-message-state; bh=FCFSogNzTjAKXRRpk0L0OgYv4nlJ/qS6RkxU3i1suoc=; b=TyBRHfyPBeIawptnweMHYzL9yjZfLoWRmR84tVzrPurZskkFJmMKskzkmlKMpuPGv/ WHdq/iCEYusA+lIsp8V7EzjFP6ObpDYZKkMUuDPTjAVIl9imR5onQRS4sZLEIOnKAd5J u02VZN6TgX7MGe6MzQshFIxsaJ/fjnOCYnRgEtglM3BKZp5O4zd1zLW6DNs9sAszmzPg orvEB/Q5mqSJR9wdy24vnbq92hx6ZGPZfQN5JwbTHITGxJGTVGKPewBxMnAI2Mrozs7a AnOtwZFIYz0HabGjRq4BHVfuSNeph3BTWgTIKMM7AaRoFHDrQk5w5umzfHUtOjhPB/Pz PEgQ== Received: by 10.224.78.83 with SMTP id j19mr666033qak.56.1347481035638; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 13:17:15 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.49.12.19 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 13:16:54 -0700 (PDT) From: David Nalley Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 16:16:54 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: test lifecycle To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnqhEf3soU0iVBvV8ZqsGE9pD5sZfnB8XT5HYQgpDP5gptN4dktz3TAwaLFcnmbqn+SpB3b X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi folks, I am thinking about making some changes to jenkins and figured I'd toss it up here before I do it to make sure no one disagrees. Here's my frustration: We are getting spammed by lots of jenkins notices, many needlessly. Prime example: junit failures when the build also failed. IMO we shouldn't even try running the unit tests as there is an explicit dependency to compile and we 'know' it won't build. So I'd run build-$branch on each commit - if successful it would trigger build-marvin, build-docs, build-apidocs, and junit. If junit succeeds build packages (though eventually we probably want to run-marvin first, but for the moment) Thoughts, comments, flames? --David