incubator-cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mohammad Nour El-Din <nour.moham...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: IRC Meeting Times
Date Sat, 08 Sep 2012 17:06:36 GMT
Oooops a writing mistake, see below

On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 7:06 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din
<nour.mohammad@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Noah...
>
> On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 6:58 PM, Noah Slater <nslater@tumbolia.org> wrote:
>> My apologies, Mohammad.
>
> 1st of all no apologies are needed at Noah :), your concern was

1st of all no apologies are needed at all Noah :), your concern was

> totally correct and actually it shows the sense of awareness about
> open communities :)
>
>>
>> Just getting up to speed on CloudStack. (My first time being a mentor.) I
>> shall take care to read the older threads. :)
>
> It would be nice for sure, but I know it is sometimes hard to dig into
> old e-mails more specifically for a very active community like ACS.
>
> But again don't feel reluctant at all sending any concerns, ideas,
> comments, feedback, etc... . My point was that this kind of concerns
> like the ones you already expressed were already discussed and hence
> there is no reason to re-discuss them again :)
>
> Cya around in the mailing lists :)
>
>>
>> On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 5:56 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din <
>> nour.mohammad@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Noah...
>>>
>>>    Please read my feedback inline
>>>
>>> On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 6:48 PM, Noah Slater <nslater@tumbolia.org> wrote:
>>> > How can people who do not use IRC participate in these meetings, or the
>>> > discussions held at them?
>>> >
>>> > It is important that community discussions take place on the mailing
>>> list.
>>> > And where they take place off the mailing list, that they are summarised
>>> on
>>> > the mailing list. It is also important that people who do not use IRC are
>>> > able to partake in discussions.
>>>
>>> Totally agree, and again, we have already discussed that. It is
>>> already ASF rules and these rules have been conducted already on other
>>> mailing threads.
>>>
>>>  But IM sometimes give better chances to discuss things in details in
>>> a way that might be better than having the same discussion over
>>> e-mail.
>>>
>>> But no decisions will/should be made with bringing them back to the
>>> mailing list and give all ppl involved the opportunity to give their
>>> opinion and participate in the decision making.
>>>
>>> >
>>> > One option is to hold meetings on IRC, post a summary of what was
>>> > discussed, and then invite people on the mailing list to continue the
>>> > discussion. But discussions must be copied to the mailing list, and
>>> people
>>> > must have a chance to participate.
>>> >
>>> > On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 10:55 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din <
>>> > nour.mohammad@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> Hi...
>>> >>
>>> >>    Will not be able to have a times that suits all, try to get a time
>>> >> that suits most of people for that time and they can attend next time,
>>> >> taking into account having ASF rules when it comes to off the mailing
>>> >> list communications.
>>> >>
>>> >> An idea I would like to propose is to have a certain list of topics
>>> >> (agenda) for a specific IRC meeting so different people can evaluate
>>> >> whether they should/shoudn't attend that meeting and hence you get
>>> >> only the people interested and less people means agreeing on time
>>> >> easier I believe.
>>> >>
>>> >> On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Joe Brockmeier <jzb@zonker.net>
wrote:
>>> >> > On Thu, Sep 6, 2012, at 04:21 PM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
>>> >> >> The reason I'm opting for 21:00 UTC is that it's after dinner.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > That's totally reasonable... but 21:00 UTC is 17:00 for folks on
>>> Eastern
>>> >> > time in the U.S., which is usually the end of the work day for
folks
>>> who
>>> >> > actually clock out at 5. (Actually, it's 17:00 part of the year,
16:00
>>> >> > part of the year since UTC is constant but you have daylight savings
>>> to
>>> >> > figure in for many timezones.)
>>> >> >
>>> >> >> I'd not rotate times, as that will confuse people.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > I agree with this - but if we go with a single time, it's going
to be
>>> >> > inconvenient for someone all of the time. So in that case, I guess
>>> we're
>>> >> > going to be stuck with deciding who gets stuck with an inconvenient
>>> time
>>> >> > all the time.
>>> >> > --
>>> >> > Joe Brockmeier
>>> >> > jzb@zonker.net
>>> >> > Twitter: @jzb
>>> >> > http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> --
>>> >> Thanks
>>> >> - Mohammad Nour
>>> >> ----
>>> >> "Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance you must keep
>>> moving"
>>> >> - Albert Einstein
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > NS
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Thanks
>>> - Mohammad Nour
>>> ----
>>> "Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance you must keep moving"
>>> - Albert Einstein
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> NS
>
>
>
> --
> Thanks
> - Mohammad Nour
> ----
> "Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance you must keep moving"
> - Albert Einstein



-- 
Thanks
- Mohammad Nour
----
"Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance you must keep moving"
- Albert Einstein

Mime
View raw message