incubator-cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mice Xia <weiran.x...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Notice file question - jquery
Date Sat, 08 Sep 2012 01:04:36 GMT
jquery.js in console-proxy is licensed under
'Dual licensed under the MIT and GPL licenses.'

while jquery.js in ui/lib is licensed under
'Dual licensed under the MIT or GPL Version 2 licenses.'

Is dual license 'and GPL' allowed in ASF?

Regards
Mice

2012/9/8 Chip Childers <chip.childers@sungard.com>

> On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 7:55 PM, Chip Childers <chip.childers@sungard.com>
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 5:59 PM, Will Chan <will.chan@citrix.com> wrote:
> >> I don't think we just ever spent the time to upgrade the one used by
> console proxy.
> >
> > If someone wants to update it, then that's great.  For now, I'm going
> > to update the tools/whisker/descriptor.xml file to accurately reflect
> > the different version.
>
> Committed the fix.
>
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-cloudstack.git;a=commitdiff;h=56a1da9f1e4cd6f4d7e6592f2b30eb5210edcedd
>
> > -chip
> >
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: David Nalley [mailto:david@gnsa.us]
> >>> Sent: Friday, September 07, 2012 2:30 PM
> >>> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >>> Subject: Notice file question - jquery
> >>>
> >>> I've spent some time trying to audit our license/notice files as well
> as our
> >>> general compliance with ASF guidelines.
> >>>
> >>> We have a notice for jquery.js 1.6.1, however, I've come across another
> >>> copy of jquery 1.3.2 - which is at:
> >>> console-proxy/js/jquery.js
> >>>
> >>> Does this need additional attribution? Is there a reason to use such
> >>> disparate version of the library?
> >>>
> >>> --David
> >>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message