incubator-cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Marcus Sorensen <>
Subject Re: RPM build is fixed, sort of...
Date Thu, 06 Sep 2012 17:30:33 GMT
nevermind, just bitten by the stuff not being included anymore and had
to install a few more dependencies.

On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Marcus Sorensen <> wrote:
> So, the RPMs build fine for me with the current 4.0 tree, but
> installing them and trying to use them, it seems something was missed,
> getting a 500 on the client:
> The absolute uri: cannot be resolved
> in either web.xml or the jar files deployed with this application
> On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 9:40 AM, David Nalley <> wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 5:47 AM, Rohit Yadav <> wrote:
>>> On 06-Sep-2012, at 3:06 PM, Hugo Trippaers <>
>>>> Hey Edison,
>>>> That should be easy to do once the build is "mavenized". I'm starting to
seriously dislike waf already, so would be happy to see it go.
>>> What technical difficulties are you facing with waf? Let's not take decision
based on one's preference.
>>> If we decide to get rid of war, then I can try to write cmake based packaging
scripts that package debs and rpm.
>>> (I package/release debs/rpm for VideoLAN's VLMC,
>>> Rohit
>> So I personally don't see why maven + rpmbuild or maven + dpkg
>> couldn't be enough for packaging.
>> Don't we really want people to be able to install CloudStack using
>> maven? Certainly from a developer standpoint I think that is an end
>> goal. Aside from the fact that it exists, I don't see anything that
>> waf currently does that maven can't do.
>> --David

View raw message