Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9D2C2CFBA for ; Thu, 9 Aug 2012 14:54:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 57610 invoked by uid 500); 9 Aug 2012 14:54:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 57577 invoked by uid 500); 9 Aug 2012 14:54:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cloudstack-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 57568 invoked by uid 99); 9 Aug 2012 14:54:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Aug 2012 14:54:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.149.149] (HELO na3sys009aog123.obsmtp.com) (74.125.149.149) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Aug 2012 14:54:22 +0000 Received: from mail-vb0-f45.google.com ([209.85.212.45]) (using TLSv1) by na3sys009aob123.postini.com ([74.125.148.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUCPPCcgr3ApowLYvqSHFLbng5z/K9hA2@postini.com; Thu, 09 Aug 2012 07:54:02 PDT Received: by vbip1 with SMTP id p1so575769vbi.32 for ; Thu, 09 Aug 2012 07:54:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=8w6MHxiHq2lZLkfYvGGEAdu516dX1ectLrqcypGMj54=; b=YO24BU4HEM4Q8byp63Y2XN+mwgtrYdzfUDMY/Du/DyEFPIe4egENrv9JEaZLl0mg68 Vokqyu8xsSjz4rhG6yYXwZJFXPDTqERd8rMUGX5Mili3PPrbT3Mm6z18L/iqu28G9a5h 5p/HJrkS7o9a28yVtHIlAduN7jozkWCwVuNkRImQQ54Ec6k4xgA0vKLPUQaUMjRW0t6O ye4ZWkIUtD31REJ2asTTv8c6pR8RbtGVsJJCEtz5LA16DjKK7xRP7aEr6KXQuMSE1Dwq t4sdL6/outOf8b2tqv7dyLQ9PupI7tPRj0LNG2ArEjMEcUE0umI0TjpJ0mxvaWCVfU/n sdLg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.58.4.232 with SMTP id n8mr19243243ven.54.1344524040711; Thu, 09 Aug 2012 07:54:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.168.212 with HTTP; Thu, 9 Aug 2012 07:54:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <6005BE083BF501439A84DC3523BAC82DE44D7E3B74@LONPMAILBOX01.citrite.net> <6005BE083BF501439A84DC3523BAC82DE44D7E41E0@LONPMAILBOX01.citrite.net> Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2012 10:54:00 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: CloudStack 4.0 release plan From: Chip Childers To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnuqw02hhcc/iBx/Y7CmGa23GMiWFIsFYNqcD5H9tffN/t7sbySeUJLtR/fSuBnlPXmBYow X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 5:58 PM, Alex Huang wrote: > I wonder if we can do the following: > > - Tag all emails about release 4.0 with something like "[ASFCS40]". This is to allow developers to easily identify 4.0 chains and prioritize it. +1 - I'll start doing that myself, as of today.