Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 56300D0E4 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 21:42:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 51067 invoked by uid 500); 16 Aug 2012 21:42:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 51041 invoked by uid 500); 16 Aug 2012 21:42:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cloudstack-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 51033 invoked by uid 99); 16 Aug 2012 21:42:24 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 21:42:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jzb@zonker.net designates 66.111.4.29 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.111.4.29] (HELO out5-smtp.messagingengine.com) (66.111.4.29) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 21:42:18 +0000 Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.45]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15B3A20786 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 17:41:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend2.nyi.mail.srv.osa ([10.202.2.161]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 16 Aug 2012 17:41:58 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=smtpout; bh=6kPbGqmjcCMg3qO4Jpplis/X4ns=; b=LU7d4TbpBY3h3OHe1tTPbdbkTA6n pZgspW2KlJ3oon+91+HwbV5D4G7VEB9PgxgKA4/Dt+5Tu6sK2IZbIvrOE+dqcmyL tYePRR2bwKicVS7F6gdxZ4uUg47HO3Myt21kDvvsXegy3V8TXwaFVCaUF9dMacAd Vk8Z+9a25MG/Vz0= X-Sasl-enc: MDMS3SBliV7yXBHf8CP5uDBUdZ11trcl6ginbvcdIIax 1345153317 Received: from localhost (unknown [74.207.237.244]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id D581F482620 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 17:41:57 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 21:41:57 +0000 From: Joe Brockmeier To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [ASFCS40] IRC Meeting for Release Tasks? Message-ID: <20120816214157.GD24150@kodos> References: <20120814164914.GA14009@kodos> <20120814185134.GA14769@kodos> <761D372D-14B3-4F2B-9AE8-A4290C30D5A0@jaguNET.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <761D372D-14B3-4F2B-9AE8-A4290C30D5A0@jaguNET.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 02:33:25PM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote: > ++1. Plus, it should not become the default method for doing development. > If the dev list becomes simply a log of irc discussions, then this > needs to be shut down at once. I can understand that decision-making on IRC would be a concern, but we're nowhere near that point. My proposal is strictly to have IRC meetings as a check-in and have an opportunity to ask people questions in real time. The mailing list will get a full report (and log) of the discussion and no decisions are going to be taken in IRC. Best, Joe -- Joe Brockmeier http://dissociatedpress.net/ Twitter: @jzb