incubator-cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Will Chan <will.c...@citrix.com>
Subject RE: [DISCUSS] VMware support was: Re: vijava - some additional thoughts
Date Thu, 09 Aug 2012 16:44:59 GMT
I prefer the same option "remove VMware SDK from the build" idea as well.  I wouldn't even
go as far as adding in other libraries.  If people want to use VMWare, I am hoping we can
just give them additional instructions on how to do that.

Will

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mice Xia [mailto:mice_xia@tcloudcomputing.com]
> Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2012 6:45 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: 答复: [DISCUSS] VMware support was: Re: vijava - some additional
> thoughts
> 
> 
> IMHO, for now, considering the schedule of ACS4.0, i vote for 'remove
> VMware support from default build'
> Replacing it with other libraries in such a short period introduces risks and
> large amount of test effort.
> 
> I'm not very familiar with vijava but in the long run I think we should use
> something like that and get rid of vmware's non-redistributable jar.
> 
> 
> Regards
> Mice
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Nalley [mailto:david@gnsa.us]
> Sent: 2012-8-9 (星期四) 19:01
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: [DISCUSS] VMware support was: Re: vijava - some additional
> thoughts
> 
> Hi folks, I wanted to circle back on this and see if we can get to consensus
> on what we want to do about VMware support, as the current status isn't
> tenable for a release.
> 
> At present it looks like our options are:
> 
> * Remove VMware support from the default build and provide instructions
> for acquiring the SDK and manually compiling VMware support. (as a side
> note, I am guessing that we won't be able to ship this in the default build)
> 
> * Ask blessing to do something like wsdl2java and ditch the vmware SDK
> completely.
> 
> * Move to using vijava.
> 
> Are there other options?
> Thoughts, comments, concerns, flames?
> 
> --David

Mime
View raw message