Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A5E65C521 for ; Wed, 6 Jun 2012 19:45:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 64147 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2012 19:45:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 64109 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2012 19:45:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cloudstack-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 64099 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jun 2012 19:45:17 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Jun 2012 19:45:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of kelven.yang@citrix.com designates 66.165.176.89 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.165.176.89] (HELO SMTP.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.89) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Jun 2012 19:45:12 +0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,725,1330923600"; d="scan'208";a="27103936" Received: from sjcpmailmx01.citrite.net ([10.216.14.74]) by FTLPIPO01.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-MD5; 06 Jun 2012 15:44:50 -0400 Received: from SJCPMAILBOX01.citrite.net ([10.216.4.72]) by SJCPMAILMX01.citrite.net ([10.216.14.74]) with mapi; Wed, 6 Jun 2012 12:44:50 -0700 From: Kelven Yang To: "cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org" Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2012 12:44:38 -0700 Subject: RE: CloudStack UIX Thread-Topic: CloudStack UIX Thread-Index: Ac1EGaGxkjFQLZ6PR6mHpzDiHonlmwAAhYXQ Message-ID: References: <7914B38A4445B34AA16EB9F1352942F1011C9722F50D@SJCPMAILBOX01.citrite.net> <707D7888-3895-4DF3-B980-6C2793D230AC@stratosec.co> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Pluggable UI and job UI are feature requirements that we need to implement,= I guess Sonny would like the feedbacks about general UIX ideas. Maybe I'm a too boring person, I actually like how Microsoft Outlook naviga= tes, with sliding tab + single tree pane. For frequent actions, how about t= o allow per-user UI profile? Allow creating customized UI profile, providin= g UI profile persistence so that people can always go back to where he was = left off, etc Kelven > -----Original Message----- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.childers@sungard.com] > Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2012 12:21 PM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: CloudStack UIX >=20 > On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 3:14 PM, Alex Huang wrote: > > > > For CloudStack Admin Console, we need to innovate in the following > areas. =A0These all have to do with being able to do more with less actio= n. > > > > - Pluggable UI to configure plugins >=20 > +1 (would be +5 if it could be) >=20 > > - A monitor pane where resources can be put into and taken out of > monitoring mode >=20 > Interesting idea, but would probably require some design concepts to > see if it would be useful / usable. >=20 > > - A simple collapsible tree view of the resources >=20 > I'm not certain I agree with a tree view for two reasons: First, a > large scale environment typically has too many elements for a tree to > be the best method of navigation. Second, it leads to the same type > of problem of too many clicks to get to something important. >=20 > Those two reservations can sometimes be dealt with pretty elegantly by > coupling a tree with a really simple (but useful) quick search > feature. >=20 > > - Jobs management ui >=20 > +1