incubator-cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Kevin Kluge <Kevin.Kl...@citrix.com>
Subject RE: Patches review
Date Tue, 19 Jun 2012 00:04:31 GMT
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Nalley [mailto:david@gnsa.us]
> Sent: Monday, June 18, 2012 2:20 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Patches review
> 
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 4:17 PM, Adrian Cole <adrian.f.cole@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > +1 gerrit, particularly as it helps avoid additional process
> > +mismatches for
> > folks working in both openstack and cloudstack
> 
> So while I like the thinking here, let me present the flip side of the coin.
> Reviewboard is what is used in a large number of other ASF projects, so
> getting reviewboard up and running is just a ticket. Whereas gerrit would
> mean we would need to have a set of committers maintain that
> infrastructure. Not necessarily a blocker, but something else to consider. This
> also means we could likely get reviewboard up in short order, while gerrit
> could potentially take longer as we have to both do the work, and wait for
> allocation of resources.

If that's the case can we default to ReviewBoard, and choose something else only if there
is strong objection?    

Does anyone have anything +/- to say from actual use of ReviewBoard?

-kevin



Mime
View raw message