incubator-cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From David Nalley <>
Subject Re: Maintainer/committer model for CloudStack
Date Thu, 17 May 2012 06:10:43 GMT
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 2:08 AM, Chiradeep Vittal
<> wrote:
> On 5/16/12 11:33 AM, "John Kinsella" <> wrote:
>>On May 16, 2012, at 5:33 AM, Robert Schweikert wrote:
>>> On 05/15/2012 10:08 PM, John Kinsella wrote:
>>>> OK - took a little longer than intended, but I've got a draft put
>>>>together. I can keep adding to this, but wanted to get it out for
>>>>comments on what's written so far.
>>>> One question - we seem to have "committers" as well as "maintainers."
>>>>What's the difference between the two?
>>>> I'm trying to reach a balance between an informal document and
>>>>something as structured as the Linux development process (see the Linux
>>>>Foundation link in the appendix). If people want to see more formality
>>>>and structure, let me know.
>>>> Please review what I have so far and share thoughts with the list.
>>>>Thanks. :)
>>>>Guide (or
>>> 3.) Being an ASF project I take it CS will use Jira, I think there
>>>should be a link to Jira in the Patch Submission section. Also it should
>>>be more clearly stated that feature requests also need to be entered in
>>>Jira, rather than just stating they should be documented.
>>Yep, I left out a few links as various functionality (new wiki, jira,
>>etc) are not yet in place. Voting and release management can be greatly
>>expanded, but wanted to get the other parts in place first.
> Any thoughts on using a review tool like Gerrit [1] or Phabricator [2] as
> a front-end to git? Would that work in the Apache infrastructure?
> [1]
> [2]
> --
> Chiradeep

Apache has reviewboard up -


View raw message