Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 284F3933C for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 22:08:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 25030 invoked by uid 500); 24 Apr 2012 22:08:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 25007 invoked by uid 500); 24 Apr 2012 22:08:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cloudstack-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 24999 invoked by uid 99); 24 Apr 2012 22:08:47 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 22:08:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of nour.mohammad@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.175] (HELO mail-ob0-f175.google.com) (209.85.214.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 22:08:42 +0000 Received: by obceq6 with SMTP id eq6so1635419obc.6 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 15:08:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=hiTLnZ2O6mnVCvBcwflsOUAxPlpLZ3yppsm/bfuXXxM=; b=GeeAb9ShWcvHYVP6Q0mUMBulrXck3oeXPR827cygMJXX3iQ6Fbq9FmNd3595P+BRX+ Xd1URcP82H5Da+Xa8W2/VlaG1bcVMSOwUy2zI1BLzpYl2T6q6iNxfVYjZqTYXpz92Rwf CtHZ46FALUsbeyrZpvy8DNYRTRrXLBAFGy5o+OMSUSYrP5dR7LhsZOj3QpYblhwFnihp HydmAFBd3DMvB3ckX+rpIAbWqBIldmo2NxwCghywJnRP4RhJ3szmXXo5PgOFChJmbbUZ CkbjzwHkHe4bHn5GhPEN8hbyZETf0SW5zIpMW0mh2thTsXqdpS7hRnHVZ25EhvqQFheq sAvA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.113.106 with SMTP id ix10mr123341obb.26.1335305301523; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 15:08:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.60.54.136 with HTTP; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 15:08:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <670F793A-38A3-4184-BFDF-B9B654EC39E0@hogstrom.org> References: <670F793A-38A3-4184-BFDF-B9B654EC39E0@hogstrom.org> Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 00:08:21 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] proposal to select a mascot for Apache CloudStack while in Incubation From: Mohammad Nour El-Din To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d0447f3b029fd3204be73fe12 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --f46d0447f3b029fd3204be73fe12 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable +1 on both what David and Matt said On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 11:37 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: > David is right. The PPMC is really only there to make sure that Apache's > interests and obligations are met. They do not really "Control" the > project in as much as make sure things that need to be done (like filing > reports, dealing with trademark, legal issues). A sign of a healthy > community is communicate on the list and just do it. > > In this case, your advocating for a logo / mascot ... +1, great idea. > > At this point, the Citrix folks (no offense) really don't have a lot to d= o > with it inasmuch as the Apache CloudStack product does. So, the only > process at this point is see if anyone has an objection (so far it doesn'= t > sound like it). I'd suggest making a Wiki page where people can post the= ir > ideas. Pick an end date, I suggest 30 days, post and wait. > > At the end of the 30-days take a community vote and the logo with the mos= t > votes wins :) > > When Citrix donated to the code to Apache and the community was formed it > is the community that gets to decide the fate, good or bad, on its own > > Matt Hogstrom > matt@hogstrom.org > > A Day Without Nuclear Fusion Is a Day Without Sunshine > > On Apr 24, 2012, at 4:49 PM, David Nalley wrote: > > >> =B7 =93Call for Submissions=94 to be sent out to cloudstack-de= v as > soon > >> as the PPMC approves this proposal > > > > > > Speaking only for myself - I don't think you need PPMC permission to > > move forward with this idea - I'd of course suggest ensuring a > > community consensus, making sure folks are well informed, etc. but > > otherwise, just go get things done. You shouldn't need to get approval > > and annointing to start getting things done IMO, especially when > > 'getting things done' means soliciting ideas on this list. Obviously > > final decisions around identity and trademarks have a legal component > > and that would be the responsibility of the PPMC. > > --=20 Thanks - Mohammad Nour ---- "Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance you must keep moving" - Albert Einstein --f46d0447f3b029fd3204be73fe12--