Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-clerezza-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-clerezza-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 561129E30 for ; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 17:36:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 53071 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jan 2012 17:36:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-clerezza-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 53040 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jan 2012 17:36:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact clerezza-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: clerezza-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list clerezza-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 53032 invoked by uid 99); 31 Jan 2012 17:36:41 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 17:36:41 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO mail-vw0-f47.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username dspicar, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 17:36:40 +0000 Received: by vbbff1 with SMTP id ff1so251892vbb.6 for ; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 09:36:39 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.17.75 with SMTP id m11mr11071297vdd.101.1328031399744; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 09:36:39 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.52.164.193 with HTTP; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 09:36:39 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [89.206.72.138] In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 18:36:39 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Board report dueFwd: Questions for projects From: Daniel Spicar To: clerezza-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec502d8ded514ef04b7d66714 --bcaec502d8ded514ef04b7d66714 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Thanks for clarification, Ross. I enhanced the entry with a reference to Domeo and the the suggestions regarding the community development entry. Does anyone else have a suggestion or information we could add? Daniel On 31 January 2012 17:37, Ross Gardler wrote: > On 31 January 2012 16:22, Daniel Spicar wrote: > > I agree that the point should be written differently. However I don't > want > > to write something the others don't agree with. Can we reach a consensus > > that we will come up with a plan on how to grow the community for the > next > > report or should I remove the entry until we're ready to make a > commitment > > in that direction? > > It is a condition of being in the Incubator that projects seek to > build a community, that's what the incubator is for. So consensus was > already reached when you entered (and you had it in your draft report > in the form of "3. Grow community." There is a drive in the Incubator > to ensure projects have a plan as to how they are going to grow their > community. This plan need not be grand, just 3-5 key concrete > activities that will contribute to community health/ > > Given the short time available for creating such a plan for this > report I'm happy to sign off with an acknowledgement of the need to > discuss this for the next report. However, removing the intent to > "grow community" will likely be more detrimental to your report than > not including my suggestion. > > Ross > --bcaec502d8ded514ef04b7d66714--