incubator-clerezza-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Daniel Spicar <dspi...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Board report dueFwd: Questions for projects
Date Tue, 31 Jan 2012 17:36:39 GMT
Thanks for clarification, Ross.

I enhanced the entry with a reference to Domeo and the the suggestions
regarding the community development entry.

Does anyone else have a suggestion or information we could add?

Daniel

On 31 January 2012 17:37, Ross Gardler <rgardler@opendirective.com> wrote:

> On 31 January 2012 16:22, Daniel Spicar <daniel.spicar@trialox.org> wrote:
> > I agree that the point should be written differently. However I don't
> want
> > to write something the others don't agree with. Can we reach a consensus
> > that we will come up with a plan on how to grow the community for the
> next
> > report or should I remove the entry until we're ready to make a
> commitment
> > in that direction?
>
> It is a condition of being in the Incubator that projects seek to
> build a community, that's what the incubator is for. So consensus was
> already reached when you entered (and you had it in your draft report
> in the form of "3. Grow community." There is a drive in the Incubator
> to ensure projects have a plan as to how they are going to grow their
> community. This plan need not be grand, just 3-5 key concrete
> activities that will contribute to community health/
>
> Given the short time available for creating such a plan for this
> report I'm happy to sign off with an acknowledgement of the need to
> discuss this for the next report. However, removing the intent to
> "grow community" will likely be more detrimental to your report than
> not including my suggestion.
>
> Ross
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message