incubator-clerezza-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Enrico Daga <enricod...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] - Relase Apache Clerezza 0.2-incubating
Date Wed, 04 Jan 2012 12:39:26 GMT
Dear Reto,
I cannot reproduce my problem today. I tried again from scratch and
everything went well :)

I closed the issue opened yesterday, to not block the releasing process.

Thank you
Enrico

On 3 January 2012 17:56, Reto Bachmann-Gmür <me@farewellutopia.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 5:04 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz
> <bdelacretaz@apache.org> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür
>> <me@farewellutopia.com> wrote:
>>> Bertrand wrote:
>>>> 5) Is the notice in ext.org.json.simple/NOTICE.txt really required?
>>>> Unless I missed something, http://code.google.com/p/json-simple/
>>>> doesn't seem to require it.
>>> Isn't it just good practice to indicate the source of copyright owner
>>> of included code in NOTICE.txt? The json simple one seems
>>> unnecessarily verbose though.
>>
>> No, the NOTICE file should only list *required* notices, as it puts a
>> burden on whoever might redistribute the code. So if you have some
>> cleanup to do anyway, you could minimize that one unless what's in
>> there is required.
> Ok, so as json simple is apache licensed without notice file we should
> not mention them. (Don't quite understand the logic of the apache
> license which allows the content of the notice to alternatively be
> included in the documentation or other places, and if this is the case
> a derivate of the derivate no longer has the content of the notice).
>
> I'll remove the suff from the file.
>
> Cheers,
> Reto



-- 
Enrico Daga

--
http://www.enridaga.net
skype: enri-pan

Mime
View raw message