Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-clerezza-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-clerezza-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D8B7090CA for ; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 08:34:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 29588 invoked by uid 500); 22 Nov 2011 08:34:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-clerezza-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 29537 invoked by uid 500); 22 Nov 2011 08:34:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact clerezza-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: clerezza-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list clerezza-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 29524 invoked by uid 99); 22 Nov 2011 08:34:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 08:34:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of tommaso.teofili@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.175] (HELO mail-gy0-f175.google.com) (209.85.160.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 08:34:38 +0000 Received: by ghy10 with SMTP id 10so3711232ghy.6 for ; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 00:34:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=5f8mTs70aEJV25aKWDqDnCpzrYTHQ4qrKd+jZNNZnVw=; b=FkvGhVM1I4T7E6+pWypYPLqtf4Bq+A/gXtYVa6L7Ih0SSbUdXDx42NtUHiDnHfC/xL Zy1Lj3qlKpbbHby4xWjh67YIBPdnR5rHNGnq4ptFQbIrDquDmgPMDQczP/7RqM22nCaa mjg3859ZH80EjNvZdtCrlc/J5qYFG8S+DuGKQ= Received: by 10.236.189.97 with SMTP id b61mr24697659yhn.116.1321950857239; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 00:34:17 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.31.69 with HTTP; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 00:33:36 -0800 (PST) From: Tommaso Teofili Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 09:33:36 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: unified versions? To: clerezza-dev Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf303f6a10419d3004b24eab35 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --20cf303f6a10419d3004b24eab35 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi all, I'm wondering if it'd be better / required to have all the modules set to the same version. We have the parent POM to 0.2(-incubating-SNAPSHOT) but lots of other modules have 0.1 / 1.6 / 0.12 and so on. What do you think about it? Tommaso --20cf303f6a10419d3004b24eab35--