Mailing-List: contact clerezza-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: clerezza-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: reto@trialox.org
In-Reply-To: <C627417C-E0AF-4277-98A0-BFADD97EA11D@bblfish.net>
References: <BANLkTikTS+X7ixJ_=rNz1A48HfrTe6oSVw@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTimj2xpSXq7nMx4GN4eNXwwAzWmDQg@mail.gmail.com>
	<111D1FA5-449E-44A1-8751-F433C5AD530C@bblfish.net>
	<BANLkTi=J616cQX_6w2rZitRNRAeOHmVZ6A@mail.gmail.com>
	<16ED0442-166E-455E-A66B-C26FE7388BDC@bblfish.net>
	<BANLkTi=6M5zjvO34Yo8YJ_YzLrHL5Goc6A@mail.gmail.com>
	<1FA1CDAA-14CB-4E6E-81C1-BEBECA0E5B1F@bblfish.net>
	<BANLkTinBE3aj7RkbmXppVu4C0_qnpjzCrg@mail.gmail.com>
	<C627417C-E0AF-4277-98A0-BFADD97EA11D@bblfish.net>
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 20:41:38 +0200
Message-ID: <BANLkTimWynzd+FVH9gUjp+z2mgoitYc4YA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: 540 in perspective -- Re: [VOTE] Accept the proposed patch of
 CLEREZZA-540
From: Reto Bachmann-Gmuer <reto@apache.org>
To: clerezza-dev@incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=90e6ba21220fd0e15b04a537af08

--90e6ba21220fd0e15b04a537af08
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 4:41 PM, Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net> wrote:

>
> On 8 Jun 2011, at 13:02, Reto Bachmann-Gmuer wrote:
>
> > Dear Henry,
> >
> > The current situation is really annoying and part of the blame goes on me
> as I'm part of the Clerezza community that failed to introduce you to the
> project and the community in a way that empowers you to identify issues
> suitable for an iterative development that leads to the envisaged viral
> social web platform and to provide resolutions for these issues capable of
> consensus.
> >
> > The current is the worst crises of our community and the biggest
> impediment to productive work we have had till now. So I urge to collaborate
> with the following approach to get back to productive work (i.e. getting
> issues closed rather than arguing):
> >
> > - you withdraw your -1 against a patch that doesn't change the behaviour
> of any existing method and which has had 5 +1
> >
> > - I will give hand to find ways to identify useful issues and solutions
> for the desired functionality. You specify the issue you'd like to address
> and I'll help you split this up into actually resolvable (and reviewable)
> issues and describe approaches on how this be resolved. Then you'll be able
> to contribute to a monotonic growth of closed (tiny) issues and thus to a
> constant improvement of clerezza.
> >
> > Please Henry, help leaving the current mess behind and get back to a
> collaboration that yields to product improvements.
>
> Ok, sounds good. +1
>
Great, thanks! I close the issue and I'll be looking at your code on
CLEREZZA-416 to make proposals on bits that can be closed and trying to
contribute patches.

Sorry for the discussion getting over heated a bit.

I'd like to add my apologies for an unfriendly tone in some of my mails.

Enjoy Berlin!

Reto

>

--90e6ba21220fd0e15b04a537af08--