Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-clerezza-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-clerezza-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4EF63536B for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 09:29:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 12586 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 09:29:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-clerezza-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 12551 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 09:29:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact clerezza-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: clerezza-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list clerezza-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 12542 invoked by uid 99); 12 May 2011 09:29:32 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 09:29:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ogrisel@nuxeo.com designates 209.85.210.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.175] (HELO mail-iy0-f175.google.com) (209.85.210.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 09:29:25 +0000 Received: by iye7 with SMTP id 7so1172836iye.6 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 02:29:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.51.17 with SMTP id b17mr7655085ibg.0.1305192543317; Thu, 12 May 2011 02:29:03 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.29.29 with HTTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 02:28:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Olivier Grisel Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 11:28:43 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: OSGi dependency learks in extension package To: clerezza-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On 11 May 2011 17:23, Tommaso Teofili wrote: > I think that depends on the recent introduction of the scala slf4j module > which is assumed to replace the "common" slf4j artifacts, however I think we > should consider what Olivier is suggesting, will try to have a deeper look. > Tommaso I have attached a fix for the pom in this jira issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLEREZZA-518 I confirm that this fixes the regression we observed on the integration tests of Stanbol. -- Olivier