incubator-clerezza-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Reto Bachmann-Gmuer <reto.bachm...@trialox.org>
Subject Re: Clerezza CAS Consumer
Date Mon, 04 Apr 2011 07:20:39 GMT
Hi Hasan


> @Reto, do we want to have a dedicated TcProvider or rather define an
> ontology for
> the mapping of CAS into properties and classes ?
> I think we should discuss both alternatives or why to you prefer one over
> the other?
>
I don't see the conflict. How should A TcProvider map the entities without
an ontology? An what's the benefit of an ontology without a tool that does
the mapping?

Cheers,
reto



>
> Kind regards
> Hasan
>
>
> On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 10:56 PM, Reto Bachmann-Gmuer <
> reto.bachmann@trialox.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi Tommaso
>>
>> Rdfizing the CAS and providing a TcProvider that provides a graph view to
>> the UIMA CAS data sounds like a grat plan. I imagine there would be
>> interesting stuff that can be done implementing cas consumers on clerezza.
>> Do you have ideas for usecases and demo apps?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Reto
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 3:09 PM, Tommaso Teofili
>> <tommaso.teofili@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>> > Hi all,
>> > recently I've been discussing with Stanbol mates [1] about possible
>> usage
>> > of
>> > text mining algorithms in Stanbol on top of UIMA, so, since they're
>> already
>> > using Clerezza we agreed that it'd be good to implement a component
>> which
>> > converts objects from the UIMA CAS model to a Clerezza Graph.
>> > Since I am familiar with both I'd volunteer to implement such a thing
>> > inside
>> > the uima module.
>> > What do you think?
>> > Regards,
>> > Tommaso
>> >
>> > [1] :
>> >
>> >
>> http://markmail.org/thread/2sstx2girbiydath#query:+page:1+mid:wbky7miem5ggdsi2+state:results
>> >
>>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message