incubator-clerezza-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Tommaso Teofili <tommaso.teof...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Clerezza CAS Consumer
Date Tue, 12 Apr 2011 10:53:12 GMT
Ok guys I will start working on this component as soon as I can :)
Cheers,
Tommaso

2011/4/6 Reto Bachmann-Gmuer <reto.bachmann@trialox.org>

> I was assuming the CAS data would is already stored by UIMA. I wasn't
> proposing to add any new storage.  As it's happening now, when you use the
> UIMAResourceTagger or UIMABaseMetadataGenerator data will be added to a
> persistent an UIMA-Independent MGraph.
>
> Cheers,
> Reto
>
> On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Hasan Hasan <hasan@trialox.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi Reto, all
> >
> > If I understand correcly, this means that the resulting metadata obtained
> > from the annotation service will not be stored in a triple store, but
> > directly on the filesystem (in which format?). The "zz-way" to access
> these
> > metadata is through this special TcProvider. Right? I think I can agree
> with
> > this. Does anybody see any problem with this approach?
> >
> > Hasan
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 10:45 AM, Reto Bachmann-Gmuer <
> > reto.bachmann@trialox.org> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 11:49 AM, Hasan Hasan <hasan@trialox.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi Reto,
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 9:20 AM, Reto Bachmann-Gmuer <
> >>> reto.bachmann@trialox.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Hi Hasan
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> @Reto, do we want to have a dedicated TcProvider or rather define
an
> >>>>> ontology for
> >>>>> the mapping of CAS into properties and classes ?
> >>>>> I think we should discuss both alternatives or why to you prefer
one
> >>>>> over the other?
> >>>>>
> >>>> I don't see the conflict. How should A TcProvider map the entities
> >>>> without an ontology? An what's the benefit of an ontology without a
> tool
> >>>> that does the mapping?
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> Probably, I misunderstand you. I thought you would like to have a
> special
> >>> TcProvider that does this mapping instead of using any TcProvider we
> have.
> >>>
> >> Yes, I'd rather have a special TcProvider gibing a life access to the
> CAS
> >> data rather than copying this data to the MGraph provided by a storing
> >> provider.
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Reto
> >>
> >>>
> >>> cheers
> >>> hasan
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Cheers,
> >>>> reto
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Kind regards
> >>>>> Hasan
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 10:56 PM, Reto Bachmann-Gmuer <
> >>>>> reto.bachmann@trialox.org> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Hi Tommaso
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Rdfizing the CAS and providing a TcProvider that provides a
graph
> view
> >>>>>> to
> >>>>>> the UIMA CAS data sounds like a grat plan. I imagine there would
be
> >>>>>> interesting stuff that can be done implementing cas consumers
on
> >>>>>> clerezza.
> >>>>>> Do you have ideas for usecases and demo apps?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Cheers,
> >>>>>> Reto
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 3:09 PM, Tommaso Teofili
> >>>>>> <tommaso.teofili@gmail.com>wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> > Hi all,
> >>>>>> > recently I've been discussing with Stanbol mates [1] about
> possible
> >>>>>> usage
> >>>>>> > of
> >>>>>> > text mining algorithms in Stanbol on top of UIMA, so, since
> they're
> >>>>>> already
> >>>>>> > using Clerezza we agreed that it'd be good to implement
a
> component
> >>>>>> which
> >>>>>> > converts objects from the UIMA CAS model to a Clerezza
Graph.
> >>>>>> > Since I am familiar with both I'd volunteer to implement
such a
> >>>>>> thing
> >>>>>> > inside
> >>>>>> > the uima module.
> >>>>>> > What do you think?
> >>>>>> > Regards,
> >>>>>> > Tommaso
> >>>>>> >
> >>>>>> > [1] :
> >>>>>> >
> >>>>>> >
> >>>>>>
> http://markmail.org/thread/2sstx2girbiydath#query:+page:1+mid:wbky7miem5ggdsi2+state:results
> >>>>>> >
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message