incubator-clerezza-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Reto Bachmann-Gmuer <reto.bachm...@trialox.org>
Subject Re: Skeleton projects and maven archetypes or from command-line
Date Mon, 14 Mar 2011 09:07:52 GMT
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Oliver Strässer <
oliver.straesser@getunik.com> wrote:

> goog idea reto
>
> don't forget a ontology project.
> I think, all skeleton needs to be available as maven prototyype as well.
> so that we could create all clerezza necessary projects structures in
> netbeans or an alternative DIE, too.
>
> is the following projectstructure possible?:
>
> main project (group)
>        module core
>                src
>                pom.xml
>                ...
>
>        module ontology
>                pom.xml
>                ....
>        pom.xml
>
> This looks identical to the existing project in archetypes, do you know how
to make an actual maven prototype out of it?

Cheers,
Reto


>
> cheers
> oli
>
>
>
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: reto@trialox.org [mailto:reto@trialox.org] Im Auftrag von Reto
> Bachmann-Gmuer
> Gesendet: Samstag, 12. März 2011 11:45
> An: clerezza-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Betreff: Skeleton projects and maven archetypes or from command-line
>
> Hello
>
> I'm writing some code to be able to create skeleton projects from the
> clerezza console, this is specially usefull in combination with
> sourcebundles as the newly created project is installed as source-bundle
> and
> you can start playing seeing the effect of your source-code changes right
> away.
>
> I'm not sure if I should support multiple project types like this and/or if
> some of these should also be available as maven prototype.
> I'm thinking to support the following project types
> - scala with activator
> - scala with declarative services
> - java with ssp
>
> the last project is what we currently have as skeleton project, as it uses
> java it doesn't yet work with source-bundles. So I'm not sure if its better
> to keep this make this a maven archetype (as planned, but I think some
> magic
> is still needed for it to be an archetype) or if it should be created via a
> command-line command (I think it might be hard to support both ways without
> code duplication).
>
> Cheers,
> Reto
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message