Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-clerezza-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 16242 invoked from network); 8 Nov 2010 10:25:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Nov 2010 10:25:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 44024 invoked by uid 500); 8 Nov 2010 10:25:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-clerezza-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 43961 invoked by uid 500); 8 Nov 2010 10:25:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact clerezza-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: clerezza-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list clerezza-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 43947 invoked by uid 99); 8 Nov 2010 10:25:33 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Nov 2010 10:25:33 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.214.175] (HELO mail-iw0-f175.google.com) (209.85.214.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Nov 2010 10:25:24 +0000 Received: by iwn42 with SMTP id 42so5960217iwn.6 for ; Mon, 08 Nov 2010 02:25:03 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.165.137 with SMTP id k9mr3214272icy.370.1289211903470; Mon, 08 Nov 2010 02:25:03 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.40.4 with HTTP; Mon, 8 Nov 2010 02:25:03 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [130.60.157.56] In-Reply-To: <4DAA9A5D-E5A9-46AE-8999-EF07AA053D57@gmail.com> References: <4DAA9A5D-E5A9-46AE-8999-EF07AA053D57@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 11:25:03 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: shortening artifact-ids From: Tsuyoshi Ito To: clerezza-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org hi there I am little bit concerned about the renaming because all users have to change their dependencies (as long as apache clerezza has missing release 1.0 features and stability issues). Seems to be a lot of work for them as well. IMO it makes sense to remove "org.apache.clerezza" from the artifactid but the question is when should it be removed - I think it would be ok when all necessary improvements/bugfixes for release 1.0 are done. I am not sure about the renaming of the parent to something else and I am against renaming it to "clerezza". cheers tsuy On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 7:27 PM, Tommaso Teofili wrote: > > Il giorno 07/nov/2010, alle ore 18.13, Reto Bachmann-Gmuer ha scritto: > >> I think it would be good to increase the probability the module keep their >> names when doing a release, if this requires little efforr. >> >> Two possibilities: >> - Cut away "org.apache.clerezza" from the artifact-ids, optionally rename >> "parent" to something else ("clerezza" ?) -> The bundleId should be changes >> to groupId:artifactId to prevent ambiguity > > +1 removing that prefix would make browsing and reading modules much more easy. > Tommaso > >> - Introduce more nesting by having additional parents and group-ids for >> platform, rdf, ext, uima and possibly jaxrs (with fileserver moved into it) >> >> What do you think? >> >> Cheers, >> Reto > >