incubator-clerezza-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Reto Bachmann-Gmür (JIRA) <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (CLEREZZA-282) .ssp handling in Integrated Development Environments (IDE)
Date Thu, 25 Nov 2010 18:25:14 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLEREZZA-282?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12935825#action_12935825
] 

Reto Bachmann-Gmür commented on CLEREZZA-282:
---------------------------------------------

[quote]
SSPs are on the whole really clever idea: they get the same functionality as JSP or ASP for
very cheap, given Scala.
So that's really nice. 
[/quote]
JSP and ASP allow to implement arbitrary functionality in it (even though with JSP Model 2
this is discoraged), the scope of SSP is much more restricted, its just about rendering a
graphnode to a format like HTML. 

So I think the disadvantages Tim Boudreau point to do not apply to SSP and I don't exactly
see what wicket could offer, an additinal templatings format?


> .ssp handling in Integrated Development Environments (IDE)
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CLEREZZA-282
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLEREZZA-282
>             Project: Clerezza
>          Issue Type: Wish
>         Environment: Netbeans, but other IDEs probably too
>            Reporter: Henry Story
>         Attachments: screenshot-1.jpg
>
>
> SSP stands for Scala Server Pages. The advantage of Scala Server Pages should be that
they are Scala. But they are not. As a result IDEs don't really work
> correctly with them as shown in the picture. This means that the IDE cannot function
as powerfully as it should. One should be able to jump to documentation
> for classes used for example, have completion working etc... Instead we have a very non
standard language, which does not even have the advantage of being
> XML (for which many editor modes exist), and for which there are very few developers
available.
> So either one should make the Scala be proper Scala or ...? 
> Btw.
> The hint for the red lines here say "Expected Class or Object definition"

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message