incubator-clerezza-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Reto Bachmann-Gmuer <reto.bachm...@trialox.org>
Subject Re: Continuous Integration
Date Fri, 11 Dec 2009 15:18:12 GMT
It's a while since I've last been using hudson, I remember it having some
features that I was missing in continuum. The only problem I had was the
rich webinterface occasionally crashing firefox, but I suppose that's fixed
by now so I'm fine with hudson.

On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 4:14 PM, Tommaso Teofili
<tommaso.teofili@gmail.com>wrote:

> my personal preference for continuous integration is for Hudson, but no
> problem on using Continuum.
> Tommaso
>
> 2009/12/11 Bertrand Delacretaz <bdelacretaz@apache.org>
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 4:10 PM, Tsuyoshi Ito <tsuy.ito@trialox.org>
> > wrote:
> > > ...Have we made a decision about the continuous integration
> > infratstructure?
> > > Should we use hudson or continuum? We have used continuum so far but I
> > have
> > > no problem with hudson....
> >
> > In Sling we are using hudson because at the time we decided, the
> > Apache continuum server was often overloaded and slow. I don't know if
> > that's still the case.
> >
> > -Bertrand
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message