Mailing-List: contact chukwa-dev-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: chukwa-dev@hadoop.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of asrabkin@gmail.com designates
 209.85.222.194 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=FK+V8bRsr7l3HrP4vlyj3PTEqogO3spVIi+1pNhYuecqcU26NB+8Xn+x4w4zueYinT
         8mvHYhaL/gR73FWCNtCvUy60Ny2OnFj0ZxQ7su2m1Mo3oVTqmRbnax/0kw0RJ8Ihdr8C
         3+cY+8hxpCVLyE7JOzVyvia8ee8nFeckKAjEg=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <C7614585.5A10%eyang@yahoo-inc.com>
References: <39b0afc00912301444t73b94fd3h3b00dcd421770f51@mail.gmail.com>
	 <C7614585.5A10%eyang@yahoo-inc.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 12:41:49 -0800
Message-ID: <39b0afc01001191241g59ab5afeuea53f1734d16fb81@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: which issues are blockers for 0.4?
From: Ariel Rabkin <asrabkin@gmail.com>
To: chukwa-dev@hadoop.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

So let's see.  We have a patch for 440, that looks ready to go.
How are 444 and 442 going?

I can document the SocketTeeWriter.

I'd like to do something about CHUKWA-447 -- metrics being too
expensive to collect -- but I don't quite know what the fix is.

Also, we should address CHUKWA-446 -- the scripts -- and update
documentation accordingly.

--Ari

On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 5:59 PM, Eric Yang <eyang@yahoo-inc.com> wrote:
> Hi Ari,
>
> I vote to fix CHUKWA-440 for 0.4. =A0CHUKWA-444 and CHUKWA-422 are nice t=
o
> have, but they might not be feature complete by February.
>
> HICC REST API, SocketTeeWriter and Socket Data Loader framework should be
> added in 0.4 documentation.
>
> Regards,
> Eric
>
> On 12/30/09 2:44 PM, "Ariel Rabkin" <asrabkin@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi all.
>>
>> I think it's time to start thinking about releasing 0.4. We have a
>> fair number of accumulated new features and bug fixes. =A0Version 0.3
>> came out in November, so I think we might reasonably target a branch
>> date of Feb 1 for 0.4. =A0 How's that sound? =A0I think there have been
>> enough improvements since 0.3 to justify the release.
>>
>> --Ari
>
>


--=20
Ari Rabkin asrabkin@gmail.com
UC Berkeley Computer Science Department