incubator-chemistry-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Florent Guillaume ...@nuxeo.com>
Subject Re: [jira] Resolved: (CMIS-124) Client Runtime Implementation
Date Wed, 12 May 2010 12:48:55 GMT
Yes, with use there's some things that may appear as suboptimal in the
current API and we cannot promise no changes. But nothing
revolutionary will come I'm sure.

As an example of changes that may or may not appear:

I don't like this part of the high-level API and find it hard to use:
    <T> T getPropertyValue(String id);
    <T> List<T> getPropertyMultivalue(String id);

After the first release is done, I'll propose to change it to:
    <T> T getPropertyValue(String id);

Which would returns a single value for a single-valued property, and a
list for a multi-valued property.


I'd also like to fold all the PropertyDecimalDefinition,
PropertyStringDefinition, etc. into the single PropertyDefinition<T>
because the sub-interfaces don't add much IMHO. Proposal to come.


(I'm not proposing to do it earlier as I really want a first release
out the door and have little enough time to work on this right now...
and I'm in vacation for the next 10 days.)

Florent



On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 6:52 PM, Florian Müller <fmueller@opentext.com> wrote:
> Hi Ugo,
>
> "Somewhat stable" is the right term. Most of the merger refactoring tasks are done. Only
the type manager implementation is still missing.
>
> I cannot promise that there will no changes within the next weeks, but we certainly will
not redesign the API.
>
>
> - Florian
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ugo Cei [mailto:u.cei@sourcesense.com]
> Sent: Freitag, 7. Mai 2010 19:18
> To: chemistry-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [jira] Resolved: (CMIS-124) Client Runtime Implementation
>
>
> On May 7, 2010, at 3:44 PM, Florian Müller wrote:
>
>> Hi Ugo,
>>
>> It's there for quite some time now.
>>
>> This page explains how you get and compile it: [1]
>> The API introduction pages [2] and [3] are a bit out-of-date. The basics are still
valid but some names have changed.
>
>
> Thank you. What I actually would like to know is whether the current APIs are considered
somewhat stable, after the Chemistry/OpenCMIS merge. I can live with an incomplete and buggy
implementation (and try to contribute fixes, as much as possible), but less so if a complete
redesign is still in the pipeline.
>
>        Ugo
>
> --
> Ugo Cei
> Sourcesense - making sense of Open Source: http://www.sourcesense.com
>
>



-- 
Florent Guillaume, Director of R&D, Nuxeo
Open Source, Java EE based, Enterprise Content Management (ECM)
http://www.nuxeo.com   http://www.nuxeo.org   +33 1 40 33 79 87

Mime
View raw message