Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-celix-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-celix-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6B7881097E for ; Thu, 2 Jan 2014 12:08:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 97453 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jan 2014 12:08:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-celix-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 97417 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jan 2014 12:08:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact celix-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: celix-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list celix-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 97399 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jan 2014 12:08:34 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jan 2014 12:08:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of a.broekhuis@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.172 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.172] (HELO mail-qc0-f172.google.com) (209.85.216.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jan 2014 12:08:29 +0000 Received: by mail-qc0-f172.google.com with SMTP id e16so13540576qcx.3 for ; Thu, 02 Jan 2014 04:08:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=1tTG3BjMHHq0Vn6069Fu985pZkY1OFXAd/iGeDgCgO4=; b=ovW70qBHUVYZ5idxERgyQujWlts91e+n7fVAvPHWUQHKO8F3HxJ5J5eEdptTQOBBM4 x+T2tyko+25y3dDrOqe2vG8PdrypCGVpadyt8NSAkUJYr10GszErmefrmK9wSmU2Y3ke 9goRsXiZpLNksjruwZFQ4D+vYMLdOsjo0qN992CBJAuURQtjJUuEvXsuYOA1EUjJeBPD /ZFCbr+pSODiyreMaN3ZRAsuBWJ7xVvflIK0xXHjhM2z2L6QecNqMgPEzRoRZ2ezwWLo p9VQqa3sD3QbwuxfX6GhGRvisFOjbvocBPN42HBdVU+gIfDPD0Vl4I2+m9do0DdVKIB/ KWmg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.224.66.134 with SMTP id n6mr137212414qai.39.1388664488641; Thu, 02 Jan 2014 04:08:08 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.96.14.134 with HTTP; Thu, 2 Jan 2014 04:08:08 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2014 13:08:08 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: [DISCUSS] Graduating to a TLP From: Alexander Broekhuis To: celix-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c2bd848ec9ce04eefba51f X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001a11c2bd848ec9ce04eefba51f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi all, Now that we are in the final steps of a new release (I am waiting a bit on the addition of the Shared Memory RSA), I'd like to discuss graduation. Looking over the past couple of years, I feel that the Celix project has shown enough to be able to graduate. Looking at [1] we did the following: * Create a release * Create an open and diverse community * Show that we understand the Apache Way At the moment we have 2 active committers, but a third is underway (waiting on addition to the incubator group). This gives us the 3 needed committers. On thing that concerns me a bit is that at the moment these committers come from 2 companies, a bit more diversity here would be nice to have. But in my opinion this doesn't have to be an issue for graduation. Why I'd like to graduate now is for multiple reasons: * Shows more maturity to the users of Celix * Makes it easier to handle code donations * Makes it easier to add new committers (in both cases because we don't have to rely on our mentors anymore) So I'd like to hear what others think of this. Please note, this isn't a vote yet, merely a discussion to see if we should start the graduation process or not. [1]: http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html -- Met vriendelijke groet, Alexander Broekhuis --001a11c2bd848ec9ce04eefba51f--