Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-celix-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-celix-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E7BB210E62 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 08:13:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 82320 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2013 08:13:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-celix-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 82296 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2013 08:13:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact celix-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: celix-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list celix-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 81976 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jul 2013 08:13:36 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Jul 2013 08:13:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: error (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [194.109.24.21] (HELO smtp-vbr1.xs4all.nl) (194.109.24.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Jul 2013 08:13:30 +0000 Received: from [10.1.18.205] (static.kpn.net [31.149.75.245] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp-vbr1.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r688CmIm021968 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 10:12:49 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from marcel.offermans@luminis.nl) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\)) Subject: Re: July board report From: Marcel Offermans In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2013 10:12:48 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <61EBB426-9DBD-4284-913C-3289B577D524@luminis.nl> References: To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 Looks good to me! On Jul 8, 2013, at 8:36 AM, Alexander Broekhuis = wrote: > Hi all, >=20 > It's reporting time again, so please find a first draft here, if there = are > any remarks, please reply somewhere in the coming 24hours. I'll add = the > text to the report tomorrow. >=20 >=20 > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > Celix >=20 > Celix is an OSGi like implementation in C with a distinct focus on > interoperability between Java and C. >=20 > Celix has been incubating since 2010-11-02. >=20 > Three most important issues to address in the move towards graduation: >=20 > 1. Grow the community > 2. Find more committers > 3. >=20 > Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to be = aware > of? > None. >=20 >=20 > How has the community developed since the last report? > Activity on the mailing list is still a bit slow, but there is still > progress. But more importantly, the Native-OSGi effort has taken a few = big > steps. The most important one is the publication of an RFP at the OSGi > Alliance [1]. The purpose of this RFP is to standardise OSGi for = native (C > and C++) languages. After the RFP is finalised work will be started on = a > RFC, this will be done in conjunction with writing a reference > implementation. For this purpose Apache Celix will be used. This also = means > that C++ will be introduced in the Celix project. Most likely large = parts > of C++ code will be donated by 2 participants of the Native-OSGi = project. > This gives us a great opportunity to add extra committers and increase = the > diversity of Celix. >=20 > How has the project developed since the last report? > As mentioned above, to be able to write a reference implementation for > Native-OSGi the scope of Celix will be extended to also include C++. > Details of this extension still need to be worked out. But for = continuity > the current (C) code base will (for now) remain the same. So any work > related to Native-OSGi will (for now) be done independently from the > current implementation. > Also work is underway to make a second release. Whereas the first = release > focused primarily on the releasing itself, this second release will = focus > on the actual implementation. Important points are: > * API consistency > * Win32 support > * APR usage > More details can be found in [2] >=20 > Date of last release: > 16-12-2012 >=20 > Please check this [ ] when you have filled in the report for Celix. >=20 > Signed-off-by: > Marcel Offermans: [ ](celix) > Karl Pauls: [ ](celix) >=20 >=20 > [1]: https://www.osgi.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D165 > [2]: http://incubator.markmail.org/thread/fza43iypjutcw2rm >=20 > --=20 > Met vriendelijke groet, >=20 > Alexander Broekhuis