incubator-celix-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gerrit Binnenmars <>
Subject Re: Release request and coding standards
Date Thu, 25 Apr 2013 19:22:50 GMT
> Hi,
>> This is not obvious from the code and not visible in the name of the type.
>>> Is it an idea to use _pt if the typedef is actually a pointer?
>> I don't have any objections to this, maybe someone else? In either case,
>> could you file a feature request for this?
> I have no big issue with typedef ending with _pt, but i would prefer to
> loose the pointer in typedef and just end with _t.
> This is than inline with apr,
Ok, using the same convention as APR is a good reason to change this.
>>> Final question: is there any plan for a new release? This would be
>> helpful
>>> to start using Celix in a product.
>> There is no date yet. But if Pepijn does have some time, I think we can try
>> to make a list of issues we want to fix for a next release. I'd love to see
>> a release where the coding style has been fixed, and where windows support
>> has been tested a bit more.
> I agree we should make a list of issues and try to make a next release. I
> agreed with Alexander to discuss f2f after my holiday.
> We will post the result of this meeting on this mailling list.
Ok, I created the four issues (hopefully in the correct way). Looking 
forward for the release.

Greetings Gerrit
> Greetings,
> Pepijn

View raw message