Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-celix-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-celix-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B55A6EE49 for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 20:01:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 88618 invoked by uid 500); 4 Feb 2013 20:01:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-celix-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 88590 invoked by uid 500); 4 Feb 2013 20:01:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact celix-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: celix-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list celix-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 88581 invoked by uid 99); 4 Feb 2013 20:01:14 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 20:01:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of nour.mohammad@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.46 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.215.46] (HELO mail-la0-f46.google.com) (209.85.215.46) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 20:01:08 +0000 Received: by mail-la0-f46.google.com with SMTP id fq12so5020479lab.19 for ; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 12:00:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=0RVkmJVBkVXwjWJr1ODtAVw7riAj3xkpFjhnOlMldy4=; b=te3P/oVmOUZv1PcT2jlcTQNRwsDJQ1hZnGt9q1W3RcT9MN9eCDgKytBtEF+SHluYQB VJhq7IuUZKwMyeAkLNMIjOu3PAh28gXZuBw+CJSiGCcq0Y1GWOPKXa6+OM4BVzoQDEkL Xs2lLrp+6HqYmEpqhenQ7+PK8fmthujU4StHqzlbWoNfJfnKyfbaD86PwlglGJCUyTaj M72Wk2BFsYl43mZqoKJ1X3K/quiEVVvZOktQNLF/9uACrhl81bvheFsjmUE3d6k4EMDT h4CDyJnoulfaQFQf3/aJsK3RAJ7+eLHBtIGX8FXzVp4otGU+f2qyNnAcmUElEQYR61ST dIlg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.101.232 with SMTP id fj8mr8333569lbb.83.1360008047294; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 12:00:47 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.114.36.228 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 12:00:46 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.114.36.228 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 12:00:46 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <6262A753-FC4F-433C-8593-8715BC1E568B@luminis.nl> References: <510b829a.05e6440a.26f4.ffffa620SMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com> <510b9b69.294e420a.783d.6400SMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com> <6262A753-FC4F-433C-8593-8715BC1E568B@luminis.nl> Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 21:00:46 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: celix example under windows From: Mohammad Nour El-Din To: celix-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d040172bf8cfa7804d4eb8c38 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --f46d040172bf8cfa7804d4eb8c38 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S3 Apologies for any typos On Feb 4, 2013 9:53 AM, "Marcel Offermans" wrote: > > Hello Alexander, > > On Feb 4, 2013, at 9:25 , Alexander Broekhuis wrote: > > > 2013/2/1 Marcel Offermans > > > >> Would it make sense to do a new release? > > > > I would like to say yes, but there are still some problems running on > > windows. I would like to do some more testing etc. Having a release > > specifically for windows which doesn't work isn't a good idea imho. > > > > I find it quite tricky, and am not sure what is the best way to go.. Not > > having a release which supports windows might scare off users, but having a > > release which compiles, but doesn't run could as well scare new users off. > > > > I do hope Lionel gets it working, and we can fix the problems he finds. If > > all seems to be pretty good, I am in favor of a new release. > > Agreed, I was initially under impression that you already had the trunk working on Windows, but I agree that it makes sense to hold off a release until we do. > > So, as a "mini roadmap" we probably agree that it makes sense to work towards a next release that "works on Windows". > > > On a side note, there aren't many tests in Celix. This makes it difficult > > to check if all works on Windows. I am working on unit tests for the > > framework, but having integration tests might be even more important. > > I agree, and maybe it also makes sense to try and setup some continuous build on Jenkins. I have no clue if Jenkins supports C projects, or how other C/C++ projects at Apache approach this, but that might be worth inquiring about. I think you can do it with Jenkins as at least you can make the build job run a build script, but I believe that the other CI options might be better, openejb for example uses buildbot Let me have a look at that and come back to u as soon as I get to something > > Greetings, Marcel > --f46d040172bf8cfa7804d4eb8c38--