incubator-celix-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alexander Broekhuis <>
Subject Re: Working towards a next release
Date Sat, 17 Nov 2012 20:17:04 GMT
> I agree with all the topics mentioned. Personally I think we can gain much
> by improving remote services and updating the documentation so that it is
> easier to get started with Apache Celix. There is nice page for a hello
> world example in Apache Celix, but a page how get a CMake build environment
> working separated from Apache Celix is missing.

Good point, I agree. Is it a good idea to have some sort of "building
framework" which can be used?

> I also think is a good idea to get the naming and typedefs straight. For
> example we now have:
> typedef struct listener_hook *listener_hook_t;
> and
> typedef struct bundle * BUNDLE;

Agree with this one as well, I prefer the lower_case_t version, and have
been using that one for newer code as well. What do you think?

Met vriendelijke groet,

Alexander Broekhuis

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message