Mailing-List: contact celix-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: celix-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of pepijnnoltes@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.220.175 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CA+T-u8ccBn2m9q5Oca8aU3Ne-3oFB+q8QGa1dMFaj13nXCnjsQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CA+T-u8fD18Tn-h-WPWQUOqauN=5F3iaKaZeAuDT-AjDZwU++zw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+T-u8ccBn2m9q5Oca8aU3Ne-3oFB+q8QGa1dMFaj13nXCnjsQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 14:45:00 +0200
Message-ID: 
 <CAPhv5g-vYQBDO=4cf7Ncf3tboG4PgeHu7U25pGB4fB3uVKcLpg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Preparing code base for a release
From: Pepijn Noltes <pepijnnoltes@gmail.com>
To: celix-dev@incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b41b8dc4f0ae504c866edfc

--047d7b41b8dc4f0ae504c866edfc
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Hi,

On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Alexander Broekhuis <a.broekhuis@gmail.com
> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Maybe not mentioned explicitly before, but I think it makes sense to do
> only a source release of Celix.
>

I agree.


>
> Things I have done:
> > * Update all headers (license and source headers) to the correct format.
> >   This includes replacing all personal names with a reference to the
> Celix
> > Project Team.
> > * Removed the Eclipse files (project and launch files.
> >   These files are not portable enough to be added to the repo.
> >   I've tested the CMake project file generation, this works but.. see
> some
> > remarks in a previous email.
> > * Created the LICENSE file
> >   This needs some extra checking. As far as I can tell I have added all
> > license for specific files we use in the codebase.
>

I double checked this and I think you got all the licenses.


> > * Created the KEYS file
> >   For signing the release a key is needed, I created one for myself and
> > added it to the KEYS file.
> >
>
> Update:
> * Added the DISCLAIMER file
> * Added the NOTICE file
> * Updated BUILDING
>
> As far as I can tell the repository now contains all required files. Can
> anyone check this?
>
> A question concerning encryption:
> The zip files used support decryption, the header mentions:
>
>   The encryption/decryption parts of this source code (as opposed to the
>
>   non-echoing password parts) were originally written in Europe.  The
>
>   whole source package can be freely distributed, including from the USA.
>
>   (Prior to January 2000, re-export from the US was a violation of US law.)
>
> Does Celix need to make an additional notice somewhere about this?
>
>
> Is there anything else missing? Or should I go on and create a RC tag and
> release file?
>

I did find a small issue. The file celix/framework/private/src/unzip.c
contains the text "For more info read MiniZip_info.txt", but this file is
not present in the source tree. Should we add it ?.

Expect for the small issue mentioned above I could not find anything
missing and therefore IMO Celix is ready for a RC tag.


Greetings,
Pepijn

--047d7b41b8dc4f0ae504c866edfc--