incubator-celix-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Pepijn Noltes <>
Subject Re: Remove Eclipse (project) files from repository
Date Tue, 21 Aug 2012 20:32:11 GMT
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 11:21 AM, Alexander Broekhuis
<> wrote:
> Hi all,
> As mentioned before, the current Eclipse project files are rather
> installation specific. They assume information about include paths etc.
> It is impossible to supply a project file which can be used by other
> installations/os'es.
> So I intend to remove the Eclipse specific files from the repository.
> Setting up your own Eclipse project is fairly straight forward, and the
> website can contain some info on this.
> A possible simple method to create an Eclipse project is CMake since
> it supports Eclipse project file generation [1]. But there are some quirks:
> * It requires the build and source project to be located next to each
> other. Not as a child (which is now the case). This has no impact on the
> project but...
> * CMake generates a project for the build directory, with a link to the
> sources.
> * This breaks Team Support in Eclipse, so in the build project, no
> repository information is available.
> * To solve this, a second project is created in the source directory. This
> project doesn't add the Git Team Provider to it (I use git-svn), I am not
> sure about SVN.
> * Since there are now 2 Source location (1 project, 1 link in the build
> project), all files are shown twice when using "Open Resource".
> What does work is the path setup, all include paths are correct and working
> for the specific system on which the Eclipse project files are generated.
> Does anyone have an objection to removing the Eclipse files from the repo?
> Imo they do more harm than any good, especially regarding a release we want
> to make.

Agree, remove the Eclipse files.

> Also, should we promote the CMake Eclipse project generation? Or document a
> manual method for creating the projects?

Not sure yet, I will try to look in to this the coming days and report
back what I think.

> [1]:


View raw message