Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0B78C11D0E for ; Sat, 5 Jul 2014 07:03:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 8377 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jul 2014 07:03:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 8323 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jul 2014 07:03:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@cassandra.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@cassandra.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 8313 invoked by uid 99); 5 Jul 2014 07:03:15 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 05 Jul 2014 07:03:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of tbarbugli@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.182 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.217.182] (HELO mail-lb0-f182.google.com) (209.85.217.182) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 05 Jul 2014 07:03:11 +0000 Received: by mail-lb0-f182.google.com with SMTP id c11so1624114lbj.13 for ; Sat, 05 Jul 2014 00:02:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=n5cwKIUtDB/JVZJxRbM1SsQ6PvHEgVYatPNrgCLoVQE=; b=uLO185ZCaKAmQMuomjIR3kDmytrbJM/9VMO1MYehv2UjDEIMVOqYc03+9JfJYMJr46 CnmugcW4SFldFQplRtMd5xpTQlAp16Ds/qdHZVfcRfZy+nEMpgXwMgWHimDvBUEZwZnT zKn6hMSnXaKrGaW1VtMDp1/r95NDH1LDgI4i3aVohmfqsCitTGSzrC3cTxqa2X2c6YVP C7t6uyG/HcMhYQDc1sfcQQMOAXN/zugeYnSfKcLv9gPkZxi6oYPJDC185XWlpeWfvLCU ZHiKKZGHgIHWwn8P18BzUzV9/qjSZEx1BryH0I8Pn+We5BRGBNPpD9iBxQpY+UHhF7us 1iOQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.23.103 with SMTP id l7mr11998628laf.39.1404543769151; Sat, 05 Jul 2014 00:02:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.112.219.102 with HTTP; Sat, 5 Jul 2014 00:02:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <790F56FE770E4286B5C27B6B282B9AF6@JackKrupansky14> Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2014 09:02:48 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: keyspace with hundreds of columnfamilies From: tommaso barbugli To: user@cassandra.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0158c3186e8e2704fd6cd43a X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --089e0158c3186e8e2704fd6cd43a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Yes my question what about CQL-style columns. 2014-07-04 12:40 GMT+02:00 Jens Rantil : > Just so you guys aren't misunderstanding each other; Tommaso, you were no= t > refering to CQL-style columns, right? > > /J > > > On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Romain HARDOUIN < > romain.hardouin@urssaf.fr> wrote: > >> Cassandra can handle many more columns (e.g. time series). >> So 100 columns is OK. >> >> Best, >> Romain >> >> >> >> tommaso barbugli a =C3=A9crit sur 03/07/2014 21:55= :18 : >> >> > De : tommaso barbugli >> > A : user@cassandra.apache.org, >> > Date : 03/07/2014 21:55 >> > Objet : Re: keyspace with hundreds of columnfamilies >> > >> > thank you for the replies; I am rethinking the schema design, one >> > possible solution is to "implode" one dimension and get N times less >> CFs. >> >> > With this approach I would come up with (cql) tables with up to 100 >> > columns; would that be a problem? >> > >> > Thank You, >> > Tommaso >> > >> > > --089e0158c3186e8e2704fd6cd43a Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Yes my question what about CQL-style columns.


2014-07-0= 4 12:40 GMT+02:00 Jens Rantil <jens.rantil@tink.se>:
Just so you guys aren't= misunderstanding each other; Tommaso, you were not refering to CQL-style c= olumns, right?

/J


On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Romain HARDOUIN <romain.hardouin@= urssaf.fr> wrote:
Cassandra can handle many more columns (e.g. time series).
So 100 columns is OK.

Best,
Romain



tommaso barbugli <tbarbugli@gmail.com> a =C3=A9crit sur 03/07/2014 21:55:18 :

> De : tommaso barbugli <tbarbugli@gmail.com>
> A : user@cassandra.apache.org,
> Date : 03/07/2014 21:55
> Objet : Re: keyspace with hundreds of columnfamilie= s
>
> thank you for the replies; I am rethinking the schema design, one
> possible solution is to "implode" one dimension and get N times less CFs.
> With this approach I would come up with (cql) tables with up to 100
> columns; would that be a problem?
>
> Thank You,
> Tommaso
>


--089e0158c3186e8e2704fd6cd43a--