incubator-cassandra-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From tommaso barbugli <tbarbu...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: keyspace with hundreds of columnfamilies
Date Sat, 05 Jul 2014 07:02:48 GMT
Yes my question what about CQL-style columns.


2014-07-04 12:40 GMT+02:00 Jens Rantil <jens.rantil@tink.se>:

> Just so you guys aren't misunderstanding each other; Tommaso, you were not
> refering to CQL-style columns, right?
>
> /J
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Romain HARDOUIN <
> romain.hardouin@urssaf.fr> wrote:
>
>> Cassandra can handle many more columns (e.g. time series).
>> So 100 columns is OK.
>>
>> Best,
>> Romain
>>
>>
>>
>> tommaso barbugli <tbarbugli@gmail.com> a écrit sur 03/07/2014 21:55:18 :
>>
>> > De : tommaso barbugli <tbarbugli@gmail.com>
>> > A : user@cassandra.apache.org,
>> > Date : 03/07/2014 21:55
>> > Objet : Re: keyspace with hundreds of columnfamilies
>> >
>> > thank you for the replies; I am rethinking the schema design, one
>> > possible solution is to "implode" one dimension and get N times less
>> CFs.
>>
>> > With this approach I would come up with (cql) tables with up to 100
>> > columns; would that be a problem?
>> >
>> > Thank You,
>> > Tommaso
>> >
>>
>
>

Mime
View raw message