Return-Path: 
 <user-return-41010-apmail-cassandra-user-archive=cassandra.apache.org@cassandra.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@www.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@www.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 94C91109AE
	for <apmail-cassandra-user-archive@www.apache.org>;
 Wed,  4 Jun 2014 20:50:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 77216 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jun 2014 20:50:19 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@cassandra.apache.org
Received: (qmail 77180 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jun 2014 20:50:19 -0000
Mailing-List: contact user-help@cassandra.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:user-help@cassandra.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:user-unsubscribe@cassandra.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:user@cassandra.apache.org>
List-Id: <user.cassandra.apache.org>
Reply-To: user@cassandra.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list user@cassandra.apache.org
Received: (qmail 77172 invoked by uid 99); 4 Jun 2014 20:50:19 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 Jun 2014 20:50:19 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0
	tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of rcoli@eventbrite.com designates
 209.85.220.171 as permitted sender)
Received: from [209.85.220.171] (HELO mail-vc0-f171.google.com)
 (209.85.220.171)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 Jun 2014 20:50:16 +0000
Received: by mail-vc0-f171.google.com with SMTP id ij19so69051vcb.16
        for <user@cassandra.apache.org>; Wed, 04 Jun 2014 13:49:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
         :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=Z6hSbKKcTbjQevFNJiwsvy+80c7HhHTyirvKrHK1TSI=;
        b=EWSnQH40CK39GPJTSW3Zmdl5Ov04Granyja2piZnED/6jFFK2Fr8LcGOLYTxx+jKU+
         fj2e2FKXe/sDfPSTrWN8cToeP99QrCWSy/QwDR/kPBsn7eiiwuzab4MFZPjExjFd3Qmd
         HcZi3723UYSKkowqp2IwNLkCgS2q5F5vZcsihG5pOvjUq5dORZF0sMrlYM572+Pwyiy8
         hmH2zTONK/wwqJVQ/xJtUzSo8dNbPc+zy9g+QaQNlyrn1GNGoRMLl/T+g9gt78vaFHEq
         0FXwfhEkzJ85IVwd6FLpecx8NkU2rkfsBqwx7F+84uK+Ebpjyep4iQ3uhKpn8G7nMjvY
         xRXg==
X-Gm-Message-State: 
 ALoCoQlxVgs8wOaOyW94POP+P8O3xYvftsfVXFym46jKVvTFjrZBUGRq9BsWufM6IC47FrYYavM6
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.220.182.5 with SMTP id ca5mr5524499vcb.50.1401914991945;
 Wed, 04 Jun 2014 13:49:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.220.155.11 with HTTP; Wed, 4 Jun 2014 13:49:51 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAAQKod16tzgNO8npJ6-m7o+ammFb+VD7+PR=xYtpH-2jxx81sQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAAQKod16tzgNO8npJ6-m7o+ammFb+VD7+PR=xYtpH-2jxx81sQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2014 13:49:51 -0700
Message-ID: 
 <CAEDUwd2=qx-dR2khhMkJr7V6r6sJnuSnZVbULRs+3-i3cXAR9A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Snapshot the data with 3 node and replicationfactor=3
From: Robert Coli <rcoli@eventbrite.com>
To: "user@cassandra.apache.org" <user@cassandra.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1133d7ea19d35004fb08c5db
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

--001a1133d7ea19d35004fb08c5db
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 1:26 PM, ng <pipelines@gmail.com> wrote:

> Is there any reason you would like to take snapshot of column family on
> each node when cluster consists of 3 nodes with keyspace on replication
> factor =3?
>

Unless all read/write occurs with CL.ALL (which is an availability
problem), there is a nonzero chance of any given write not being on any
given node at any given time.

=Rob

--001a1133d7ea19d35004fb08c5db
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On W=
ed, Jun 4, 2014 at 1:26 PM, ng <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:pipe=
lines@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">pipelines@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote=
:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-le=
ft:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div dir=3D"ltr"><div>Is there any reason you would like to take snapshot o=
f column family on each node when cluster consists of 3 nodes with keyspace=
 on replication factor =3D3?<br></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><di=
v>
Unless all read/write occurs with CL.ALL (which is an availability problem)=
, there is a nonzero chance of any given write not being on any given node =
at any given time.</div><div><br></div><div>=3DRob</div><div><br></div></di=
v>
</div></div>

--001a1133d7ea19d35004fb08c5db--