Return-Path: 
 <user-return-39190-apmail-cassandra-user-archive=cassandra.apache.org@cassandra.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@www.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@www.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AC770105AE
	for <apmail-cassandra-user-archive@www.apache.org>;
 Mon, 24 Feb 2014 15:48:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 76507 invoked by uid 500); 24 Feb 2014 15:48:13 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@cassandra.apache.org
Received: (qmail 76447 invoked by uid 500); 24 Feb 2014 15:48:12 -0000
Mailing-List: contact user-help@cassandra.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:user-help@cassandra.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:user-unsubscribe@cassandra.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:user@cassandra.apache.org>
List-Id: <user.cassandra.apache.org>
Reply-To: user@cassandra.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list user@cassandra.apache.org
Received: (qmail 76434 invoked by uid 99); 24 Feb 2014 15:48:11 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 15:48:11 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.5 required=5.0
	tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of 0x6e6562@gmail.com designates
 209.85.220.176 as permitted sender)
Received: from [209.85.220.176] (HELO mail-vc0-f176.google.com)
 (209.85.220.176)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 15:48:04 +0000
Received: by mail-vc0-f176.google.com with SMTP id la4so5827265vcb.21
        for <user@cassandra.apache.org>; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 07:47:44 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=1VYhjGfwimD3Ee2xrVXuGRqCvhy9+UnFT3HR9rcqdxU=;
        b=Hah544zTXNjJV3RvMDLOYyFErEi9sFVs0nVy0EXsIX8svQPKnRPpcutliA3yWVv3cc
         kSWuvnAqg2bVL0rDVzZ2Vt1U6l5JRF/KWHA3j5F1S7JezRT5i8Y47Kg64cpt8yanYHCb
         ARVPenfPFzqhjSGZCnftxDR7CVPS7V2Qj4YrsUWbtoeerhmkzeP7CB0R7IiJxkZGYCYC
         r/poS59sWss8JhlESkjqWBEVRtVWXqpyst46/1+wKQC+Cefvn+Hd1iYGee3DG44DtMKu
         HUifCzcmuqBnHpJysGeKF8ZIfT1T8pydxBAfXjd9qBQ2WRqMhTXJfQtbjRX0s8YFv4nP
         C+pQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.221.66.73 with SMTP id xp9mr12997613vcb.27.1393256863917;
 Mon, 24 Feb 2014 07:47:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.58.109.33 with HTTP; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 07:47:43 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 15:47:43 +0000
Message-ID: 
 <CAB-G1jjxZopJ98+qv0vGodFcA_5H1M9R6A_vuFzCgW2q16vj+A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: CQL decimal encoding
From: Ben Hood <0x6e6562@gmail.com>
To: user@cassandra.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

Hi,

I'd like to implement decimal encoding for gocql but I'm wondering
what this should be compatible with. Is there some kind of wire format
that arbitrary precision numbers should adhere to to ensure
interoperability?

Cheers,

Ben