Mailing-List: contact user-help@cassandra.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: user@cassandra.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of rcoli@eventbrite.com
 designates 209.85.215.50 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAENxBwz6TtrW92scBomO=jWtX8D4npYarzxbd1PZn1khD0Cstg@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAFCV=4HDsFxmS1v6zxGLcMKuEm0OxfORuD+R-pOd0EE27iJk5A@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJMN9iNOW8UOJM6PHwVyXWK-26whzBPXn7+j6kmSazCG1eCs+w@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAENxBwz6TtrW92scBomO=jWtX8D4npYarzxbd1PZn1khD0Cstg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2013 14:58:07 -0800
Message-ID: 
 <CAEDUwd3-ZatvbS-GBMyR1wPebSWo00YkLbBFU2vdwYR0p3+svg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Crash with TombstoneOverwhelmingException
From: Robert Coli <rcoli@eventbrite.com>
To: "user@cassandra.apache.org" <user@cassandra.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c367ae89e38604eec860f7

--001a11c367ae89e38604eec860f7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

 On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 10:01 AM, Edward Capriolo <edlinuxguru@gmail.com>wrote:

> I have to hijack this thread. There seem to be many problems with the
> 2.0.3 release.
>

+1. There is no 2.0.x release I consider production ready, even after
today's 2.0.4.

Outside of passing all unit tests, factors into the release voting process?
> What other type of extended real world testing should be done to find bugs
> like this one that unit testing wont?
>

I also +1 these questions. Voting seems of limited use given the outputs of
the process.

>
> Here is a whack y idea that I am half serious about. Make a CMS for
> http://cassndra.apache.org  that back ends it's data and reporting into
> cassandra. No release unless Cassanda db that servers the site is upgraded
> first. :)
>

I agree wholeheartedly that eating ones own dogfood is informative.

=Rob

--001a11c367ae89e38604eec860f7
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr">=A0On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 10:01 AM, Edward Capriolo <span=
 dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:edlinuxguru@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank"=
>edlinuxguru@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div=
 class=3D"gmail_quote">

<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p=
x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir=3D"ltr"><div><div><div><div><div>I =
have to hijack this thread. There seem to be many problems with the 2.0.3 r=
elease. =A0</div>
</div></div></div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>+1. There is=
 no 2.0.x release I consider production ready, even after today&#39;s 2.0.4=
.=A0</div><div><br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:=
0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div dir=3D"ltr"><div><div><div>Outside of passing all unit tests, factors =
into the release voting process?<br></div>What other type of extended real =
world testing should be done to find bugs like this one that unit testing w=
ont?</div>
</div></div></blockquote><div>=A0</div><div>I also +1 these questions. Voti=
ng seems of limited use given the outputs of the process.</div><blockquote =
class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid=
;padding-left:1ex">
<div dir=3D"ltr"><div><div><br></div></div></div></blockquote><blockquote c=
lass=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;=
padding-left:1ex"><div dir=3D"ltr"><div><div></div></div><div>Here is a wha=
ck y idea that I am half serious about. Make a CMS for <a href=3D"http://ca=
ssndra.apache.org" target=3D"_blank">http://cassndra.apache.org</a>=A0 that=
 back ends it&#39;s data and reporting into cassandra. No release unless Ca=
ssanda db that servers the site is upgraded first. :)=A0</div>
</div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I agree wholeheartedly that eating o=
nes own dogfood is informative.</div><div><br></div><div>=3DRob</div><div>=
=A0</div></div></div></div>

--001a11c367ae89e38604eec860f7--