Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BF0D710386 for ; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 20:32:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 30427 invoked by uid 500); 21 Oct 2013 20:32:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 30062 invoked by uid 500); 21 Oct 2013 20:32:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@cassandra.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@cassandra.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 30054 invoked by uid 99); 21 Oct 2013 20:32:27 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 20:32:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of edlinuxguru@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.182 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.182] (HELO mail-wi0-f182.google.com) (209.85.212.182) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 20:32:21 +0000 Received: by mail-wi0-f182.google.com with SMTP id ez12so4648525wid.15 for ; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 13:32:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=45AeIpejr6bCB2EmVnHJbTmeJI6DYSFBOVE9CPlrxfo=; b=Go5lbaTn01bkPZybkFRtO2m7CeJ4TEIeV0ucsHzsEqPrmsZqwJsS1ZbdQiSVCup8ZV p+rsI8YFVDE3p/XOZ7mWRmkfEzNARKxRTqIuwlK64Bfp4FD/gW+064wZUn+mybo5BCaw AFKKTK03uFQdZzoFHKkxhuimuta8Bbz7JGBluW/ET0y3CACbwB0Fu1TN62mbe7ZHIOVL 059fP0QIW8sij68bbtbDgPzaVUULDxIvHAiHiYqntf78dbv5ITTy1ZWZcZtoJXe9Bi6f 5CPcBKdJIGrPpXdAKoWj7EQrAenqgFsUxss6iO7phx/IHolUNpkYNhaqHNKmFIE5ZdNC nRVw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.175.133 with SMTP id ca5mr15156371wjc.19.1382387520909; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 13:32:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.194.220.105 with HTTP; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 13:32:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 16:32:00 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: mixed linux/windows cluster in Cassandra-1.2 From: Edward Capriolo To: "user@cassandra.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e01493c5a203bd404e9462d2b X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --089e01493c5a203bd404e9462d2b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable We ran a Cassandra LAN party once with a mixed environment. http://www.datastax.com/dev/blog/cassandra-nyc-lan-party This was obviously a trivial setup. I think areas of concern would if you have column families located on different devices and streaming related issues. It might work just fine however, but I would test the migration first before just trying to run mixed mode. On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 4:15 PM, =E9=CC=D8=D1 =FB=C9=D0=C9=C3=C9=CE wrote: > We want to migrate hundred gigabytes cluster from winows to linux without > operation interruption. I.e. node by node. > > =D7=D4=CF=D2=CE=C9=CB, 22 =CF=CB=D4=D1=C2=D2=D1 2013 =C7. =D0=CF=CC=D8=DA= =CF=D7=C1=D4=C5=CC=D8 Jon Haddad =D0=C9=D3=C1=CC: > >> I can't imagine any situation where this would be practical. What would >> be the reason to even consider this? >> >> On Oct 21, 2013, at 11:06 AM, Robert Coli wrote: >> >> On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 12:55 AM, =E9=CC=D8=D1 =FB=C9=D0=C9=C3=C9=CE wrote: >> >>> is mixed linux/windows cluster configuration supported in 1.2 ? >>> >> >> I don't think it's officially supported in any version; you would be >> among a very small number of people operating in this way. However there= is >> no technical reason it "shouldn't" work. >> >> =3DRob >> >> >> --089e01493c5a203bd404e9462d2b Content-Type: text/html; charset=KOI8-R Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 4:15 PM, =E9=CC=D8=D1 =FB=C9=D0=C9=C3=C9=CE= <chipitsine@gmail.com> wrote:
We want to migrate hundred gigabytes cluster= from winows to linux without operation interruption. I.e. node by node.
=D7=D4=CF=D2=CE=C9=CB, 22 =CF=CB=D4=D1=C2=D2=D1 2013 =C7. =D0=CF=CC=D8= =DA=CF=D7=C1=D4=C5=CC=D8 Jon Haddad =D0=C9=D3=C1=CC:
I can't imagine any situation = where this would be practical. =9AWhat would be the reason to even consider= this?

On Oct 21, 2013, at 11:06 AM, Robert Coli <= rcoli@eventbrite.com> wrote:

On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 12:5= 5 AM, =E9=CC=D8=D1 =FB=C9=D0=C9=C3=C9=CE <chipitsin= e@gmail.com> wrote:
is mixed linux/windows cluster configuration= supported in 1.2 ?

I don't think i= t's officially supported in any version; you would be among a very smal= l number of people operating in this way. However there is no technical rea= son it "shouldn't" work.

=3DRob



--089e01493c5a203bd404e9462d2b--