Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5862410044 for ; Sat, 3 Aug 2013 18:34:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 13091 invoked by uid 500); 3 Aug 2013 18:34:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 12659 invoked by uid 500); 3 Aug 2013 18:34:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@cassandra.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@cassandra.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 12651 invoked by uid 99); 3 Aug 2013 18:34:17 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 03 Aug 2013 18:34:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of rajkumar.w93@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.177 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.177] (HELO mail-ob0-f177.google.com) (209.85.214.177) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 03 Aug 2013 18:34:12 +0000 Received: by mail-ob0-f177.google.com with SMTP id f8so3122152obp.8 for ; Sat, 03 Aug 2013 11:33:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=iORBtD66GsZ6/AS+lHdRE2gJWGxB3EbFiD0qSJS4YXI=; b=KF1D9vRKS8ANcIhHbSNuyWvcZ59FqwF3FOnfNRXnoWBUGzAqI2d1X8eESweNP5DRX+ zgOmgw9pfTaA8j81ZGCtfKX6YlUHh31kcbidbP3Ud26W8Eyc6+r4YquHkaOOO39Mu89P sQ/smC/nC51Ecb9bSnb9z6IrVeqnztemR/5lFuxU4b2+12HH7eN5cfQMQjX6lpYal0FR U+IAuNLhz1iAS3VO+035pbbEArHKUENYenG5vt4xpxb5P99ehGHnKNA5p4l2kbpYRWuv wZOMnC0EZEJ9RbOGaRqMbAtUxPdvSoZgokJ+huLMpLZfGGqX0+E+RZr9f4Q6WFhhHlgO ljow== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.56.166 with SMTP id b6mr9503482oeq.38.1375554832145; Sat, 03 Aug 2013 11:33:52 -0700 (PDT) Sender: rajkumar.w93@gmail.com Received: by 10.182.101.162 with HTTP; Sat, 3 Aug 2013 11:33:52 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 4 Aug 2013 00:03:52 +0530 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 85_Fk__DXM8beTsmQhrmjUzW9BM Message-ID: Subject: Which of these VPS configurations would perform better for Cassandra ? From: Ertio Lew To: user Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0149d17a23a87f04e30f5142 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --089e0149d17a23a87f04e30f5142 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I am building a cluster(initially starting with a 2-3 nodes cluster). I have came across two seemingly good options for hosting, Linode & Digital Ocean. VPS configuration for both listed below: Linode:- ------------------ XEN Virtualization 2 GB RAM 8 cores CPU (2x priority) (8 processor Xen instances) 96 GB Storage Digital Ocean:- ------------------------- KVM Virtualization 2GB Memory 2 Cores 40GB ***SSD *Disk*** Digitial Ocean's VPS is at half price of above listed Linode VPS, Could you clarify which of these two VPS would be better as Cassandra nodes ? --089e0149d17a23a87f04e30f5142 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I am building a cluster(initially starting with a 2-3 node= s cluster). I have came across two seemingly good options for hosting, Lino= de & Digital Ocean. VPS configuration for both listed below:

Linode:-

------------------

XEN Virtualization
2 GB RA= M
8 cores CPU (2x priority) (8 processor Xen instances)
96 GB Storage=

Digital Ocean:-

-------------------------

KVM Virtualization
2GB Memory
2 Cores
40GB **SSD Disk***

Digitial Ocean's VPS is at half price of above listed Linode VP= S,=A0

Could you clarify which of th= ese two VPS would be better as Cassandra nodes ?

--089e0149d17a23a87f04e30f5142--