Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D27CC102A3 for ; Sun, 4 Aug 2013 13:42:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 99986 invoked by uid 500); 4 Aug 2013 13:42:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 99934 invoked by uid 500); 4 Aug 2013 13:42:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@cassandra.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@cassandra.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 99926 invoked by uid 99); 4 Aug 2013 13:42:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 04 Aug 2013 13:42:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of rajkumar.w93@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.42 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.219.42] (HELO mail-oa0-f42.google.com) (209.85.219.42) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 04 Aug 2013 13:42:16 +0000 Received: by mail-oa0-f42.google.com with SMTP id i18so4492327oag.15 for ; Sun, 04 Aug 2013 06:41:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=mJaNuigd49RHTRZJT5dclQncRNrnazkJNenKcRbhcLw=; b=ihxp/s1Dt5X7Ld4hmcqczlwdRB793194V7uMuGqhYKfaLyJMGoINxDCUkO73wsFkyJ +DNQFiswqSpmmRU1pv+5LA0XdFGKPKcfLjWx8cQ1ifEOpGTtjPhSUOplUvmE0i+r3afv l+45b0ntvWqfEGl5JTxmo+OMC++wAV7CvppxXtfZYKH4pZFWArxMkOt9pXXdvamTaQ23 5g9GnsdyEYQD8bVbNiRypZvHIoeQMK3xk1j+eUa2VOZ3uXSNBTppvH6sfek6+Rt6TC7U CuAg5kugpY25uGHHmAwgKfq6JEdojDLngkcl3EJ9ETiD7acgr/rupx7rZWpXmAL81UyM TeHw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.45.229 with SMTP id q5mr11257646oem.79.1375623715690; Sun, 04 Aug 2013 06:41:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.182.108.199 with HTTP; Sun, 4 Aug 2013 06:41:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <51FE513D.1010600@filez.com> References: <11979688-841C-4313-969C-3B0E30864A45@humbaba.net> <51FE513D.1010600@filez.com> Date: Sun, 4 Aug 2013 19:11:55 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Which of these VPS configurations would perform better for Cassandra ? From: Rajkumar Gupta To: user Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c21b04eb229504e31f5aa0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001a11c21b04eb229504e31f5aa0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 okay, so what should a workable VPS configuration to start with & minimum how many nodes to start with(2 ok?) ? Seriously I cannot afford the tensions of colocation setup. My hosting provider provides SSD drives with KVM virtualization. --001a11c21b04eb229504e31f5aa0 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
okay, so what should a workable= VPS configuration to start with & minimum how many nodes to start with= (2 ok?) ? =A0Seriously I cannot afford the tensions of colocation setup. = =A0My hosting provider provides SSD drives with KVM virtualization.
--001a11c21b04eb229504e31f5aa0--