Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9AF8110EBD for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2013 05:40:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 84488 invoked by uid 500); 14 Aug 2013 05:40:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 84374 invoked by uid 500); 14 Aug 2013 05:40:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@cassandra.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@cassandra.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 84365 invoked by uid 99); 14 Aug 2013 05:40:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Aug 2013 05:40:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of nyadav.ait@gmail.com designates 209.85.192.181 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.192.181] (HELO mail-pd0-f181.google.com) (209.85.192.181) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Aug 2013 05:40:04 +0000 Received: by mail-pd0-f181.google.com with SMTP id g10so5845406pdj.26 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2013 22:39:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=WKmiy3tBgSJvNnJGPomQwEvr3XcPXAAsmZ2AN8Pvbgo=; b=mTNrU0jW5hNXL0mAFmq1+BdUqTa/5/QHUzjAzdieLUE0IZizRJSI1fDsTFa4aHb6df 7Uv3mJVFNwwXmR3oHt3nIr1IE10n3aIaHun0/BLdjAyEgrOetFt2B3fb9pwyxEL6Rhe6 qjlgJ59nPWwiIJbiIpgY47NUA45MZhVxiIPL3pHcsLWCuR3NFOxT9zZbKpo3RGGkn14S M+SIimIrSaZTUiSy+loHwet+ANOYIz+WHjkCvOTRjLftFIkupTQlh/KN0VDDkGdbifp1 SZnTTz6YK5kA7qcfHQxwxIUo29JZwuwat1hCJJyldkvVO80YFkQuqvFdmkRq4srFC5HO vBiQ== X-Received: by 10.66.253.69 with SMTP id zy5mr8161533pac.29.1376458784570; Tue, 13 Aug 2013 22:39:44 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.126.134 with HTTP; Tue, 13 Aug 2013 22:39:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <57C7C3CBDCB04F45A57AEC4CB21C0CCD1DBEC9AE@mbx024-e1-nj-6.exch024.domain.local> <4C3AA82D-E150-4134-B84D-965DEC8AF3B2@dundee.ac.uk> From: Naresh Yadav Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 11:09:24 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Cassandra HANGS after some writes To: user@cassandra.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b160097e7071f04e3e1c863 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --047d7b160097e7071f04e3e1c863 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I made one single change in default cassandra.yaml, just to experiment. native_transport_min_threads: *1* native_transport_max_threads: *1* with max one single thread for native protocol requests i noticed some improvement, earlier with default yaml most of time it was failing after * 10K* combinations BUT with this it worked storing *30K* combinations out of 1lakh.. Please guide me further on this hint... Naresh On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:06 PM, Robert Coli wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Andrew Cobley wrote: > >> Has anyone ever done any performance comparisons of linux vs a headless >> windows server ? >> > > No, but given the number of linux specific optimizations in Cassandra, I > would expect this to be no contest. > > =Rob > --047d7b160097e7071f04e3e1c863 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I made one single change in def= ault cassandra.yaml, just to experiment.

native_transport_min_thread= s: 1
native_transport_max_threads: 1

with max one single thread for native protocol requests i noticed some impr= ovement, earlier with default yaml most of time it was failing after 10K= combinations BUT with this it worked storing 30K combinations o= ut of 1lakh..

Please guide me further on this hint..= .

= Naresh

O= n Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:06 PM, Robert Coli <rcoli@eventbrite.com= > wrote:
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Andrew Cobley <a.e.coble= y@dundee.ac.uk> wrote:
Has anyone ever done any performan= ce comparisons of linux vs a headless windows server ?

No, but given the number of linux specific op= timizations in Cassandra, I would expect this to be no contest.

=3DRob=A0


--047d7b160097e7071f04e3e1c863--