I mentioned a few limitations, so I'm not sure which you refer to.As for not being able to access a CQL3 column family via traditional approaches, beyond the example I gave above (where cassandra-cli claims it does not recognize the column family), here is an article that mentions it:As for not being able to insert dynamic columns, here is what happens if you try:cqlsh:test> insert into test3(key,c1,c2,newcol) values ('a3','a3c1','a3c2','a3newcol');
Bad Request: Unknown identifier newcolThis is probably alarming, but don't fret, there is an alternative to dynamic columns, and that's the new support for CQL3 collections (see http://www.datastax.com/dev/blog/cql3_collections). You have access to sets, lists, and maps, as column types, which can be very useful. Do note that you should be careful to limit the size of a given collection because collections are read in their entirety in order to access a single element of the collection (see that article for more details). Also, the traditional Thrift / column family approach is not deprecated, CQL3 is just an alternative (and noncompatible) approach. If you have a data model that's working for you, stick with Thrift / CQL2.See "Mixing static and dynamic" at http://www.datastax.com/dev/blog/thrift-to-cql3As for standard column families representing as one row per key/column pair, you can read more about that here: http://www.datastax.com/dev/blog/thrift-to-cql3 - this is also in the "Mixing static and dynamic" section, a little farther down.On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Shahab Yunus <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
Thanks Eric for the detailed explanation but can you point to a source or document for this restriction in CQL3 tables? Doesn't it take away the main feature of the NoSQL store? Or am I am missing something obvious here?Regards,ShahabOn Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 2:12 PM, Eric Stevens <email@example.com> wrote:
If this is a standard column family, not a CQL3 table, then using CQL3 will not give you the results you expect.From cassandra-cli, let's set up some test data:[default@unknown] create keyspace test;[default@unknown] use test;[default@test] create column family test;[default@test] set test['a1']['c1'] = 'a1c1';[default@test] set test['a1']['c2'] = 'a1c2';[default@test] set test['a2']['c1'] = 'a2c1';[default@test] set test['a2']['c2'] = 'a2c2';Two rows with two columns each, right? Not as far as CQL3 is concerned:cqlsh> use test;cqlsh:test> select * from test;key | column1 | value-----+---------+--------a2 | 0xc1 | 0xa2c1a2 | 0xc2 | 0xa2c2a1 | 0xc1 | 0xa1c1a1 | 0xc2 | 0xa1c2Basically for CQL3, without the additional metadata and enforcement that is established by having created the column family as a CQL3 table, CQL will treat each key/column pair as a separate row for CQL purposes. This is most likely at least in part due to the fact that CQL3 tables cannot have arbitrary columns like standard column families can. It wouldn't know what columns are available for display. This also exposes some of the underlying structure behind CQL3 tables.CQL 3 is not reverse compatible with CQL 2 for most things. If you cannot migrate your data to a CQL3 table.The equivalent structure in CQL3 tablescqlsh:test> create table test3 (key text PRIMARY KEY, c1 text, c2 text);cqlsh:test> INSERT INTO test3(key, c1, c2) VALUES ('a1', 'a1c1', 'a1c2');cqlsh:test> INSERT INTO test3(key, c1, c2) VALUES ('a2', 'a2c1', 'a2c2');cqlsh:test> select * from test3;key | c1 | c2-----+------+------a2 | a2c1 | a2c2a1 | a1c1 | a1c2This comes with many important restrictions, one of which as mentioned is that you cannot have arbitrary columns in a CQL3 table, just like you cannot in a traditional relational database. Likewise you cannot use traditional approaches to populating data into a CQL3 table:[default@test] get test3['a1'];test3 not found in current keyspace.[default@test] set test3['a3']['c1'] = 'a3c1';test3 not found in current keyspace.[default@test] describe test3;WARNING: CQL3 tables are intentionally omitted from 'describe' output.
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 12:56 PM, ekaqu something <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:I run a 1.1 cluster and currently testing out a 1.2 cluster. I have noticed that with 1.2 it switched to CQL3 which is acting differently than I would expect. When I do "select key from \"cf\";" I get many many duplicate keys. When I did the same with CQL 2 I only get the keys defined. This seems to also be the case for count(*), in cql2 it would return the number of keys i have, in 3 it returns way more than i really have.$ cqlsh `hostname` <<EOFuse keyspace;select count(*) from "cf";EOFcount-------10000Default LIMIT of 10000 was used. Specify your own LIMIT clause to get more results.$ cqlsh `hostname` -3 <<EOFuse keyspace;select count(*) from "cf";EOFcount-------10000Default LIMIT of 10000 was used. Specify your own LIMIT clause to get more results.$ cqlsh `hostname` -2 <<EOFuse keyspace;select count(*) from cf;EOFcount-------19341934 rows have really been inserted. Is there something up with cql3 or is there something else going on?Thanks for your time reading this email.