incubator-cassandra-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Edward Capriolo <edlinuxg...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: hector or astyanax
Date Mon, 06 May 2013 00:39:20 GMT
I am aware of no benchmark that shows the binary driver to be faster then
thrift. Yes. Theoretically a driver that with multiplex *should be* faster
in *some* cases. However I have never seen any evidence to back up this
theory anecdotal or otherwise.

In fact....
https://github.com/pchalamet/cassandra-sharp/pull/24


On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Derek Williams <derek@fyrie.net> wrote:

> The binary protocol is able to multiplex multiple requests using a single
> connection, which can lead to much better performance (similar to HTTP vs
> SPDY). This is without comparing the performance of thrift vs binary
> protocol, which I assume the binary protocol would be faster since it is
> specialized for cassandra requests.
>
>
> On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 12:14 PM, Renato Marroquín Mogrovejo <
> renatoj.marroquin@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hey Shamim,
>>
>> Why do you say that Java-Driver has better performance over Hector or
>> Astyanax? Is there any reasons for this?
>> Thanks.
>>
>>
>> Renato M.
>>
>> 2013/5/5 Shamim <srecon@yandex.ru>:
>> > Hi,
>> >   Astyanax is just a refactoring of Hector and implements a few common
>> cassandra use cases. Very easy to use api. In Astyanax you will found all
>> the functions from hector. For better performance you can also check
>> datastax java driver https://github.com/datastax/java-driver.
>> >
>> > There are another lightweight client from twitter
>> https://github.com/twitter/cassie
>> >
>> > --
>> > Best regards
>> >   Shamim A.
>> >
>> > 05.05.2013, 05:30, "李 晗" <bjbylh@me.com>:
>> >> hello,
>> >> i want to know which cassandra client is better?
>> >> and what are their advantages and disadvantages?
>> >>
>> >> thanks
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Derek Williams
>

Mime
View raw message